Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026
Utero-tubal Embryo Transfer and Vasectomy in the Mouse Model
Published on: February 28, 2014
A Comparative Analysis of Intratesticular Versus Intra-Epididymal Injections of Clove Essential Oil on Male Dog
Morteza Poormohammad1, Mohammad Hossein Safari2, Shadi Emami Moghadam1
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
Background:
Chemical castration offers a highly beneficial and safe alternative to surgical sterilization for stray male dogs.
Objective:
This study investigates the effectiveness of intratesticular (ITI) and intra-epididymal (IEI) injections of clove essential oil for chemical castration in male dogs as a non-surgical sterilization method.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-four mixed-breed male dogs were randomly assigned to four groups: two treatment groups receiving clove-oil injections (bilateral ITI or IEI) and two control groups receiving saline. Blood samples were collected on Days 0, 3, 12, 21, 30 and 40, whereas semen quality and ultrasound data were analysed at 8- and 4-day intervals, respectively, to assess testosterone levels, sperm quality and testicular and epididymal changes. Dogs were castrated on Day 40 for morphological and histological tissue evaluation.
Results:
Both treatment groups showed significant decreases in sperm concentration, motility and viability and increased sperm abnormalities compared to control groups (p < 0.05). ITI injection caused significantly greater testosterone decline (p < 0.005), whereas IEI treatment produced notably enlarged epididymal tail volumes (p < 0.0001). Histological evaluation demonstrated marked testicular necrosis, inflammation and fibrosis following ITI clove-oil administration, whereas IEI alterations remained mild. Ultrasound assessments confirmed altered blood flow and echogenicity consistent with reproductive tissue damage after ITI injection.
Conclusions:
Clove-oil injections could provide an effective, less invasive alternative to surgical castration. ITI administration was simpler and produced permanent testicular damage, whereas IEI treatment induced mainly functional changes with minimal structural disruption by Day 40. Confirming reversibility of epididymal effects will require comprehensive long-term investigation.
