Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Learning Decouples Accuracy and Reaction Time for Rapid Decisions in a Transitive Inference Task
Fabian Munoz1,2, Greg Jensen3, Maxwell Shinn4
1Columbia University Medical Center.
None:
Transitive inference (TI) is a cognitive process in which decisions are guided by internal representations of abstract relationships. Although the mechanisms underlying transitive learning have been well studied, the dynamics of the decision-making process during learning and inference remain less clearly understood. In this study, we investigated whether a modeling framework traditionally applied to perceptual decision-making-the drift diffusion model (DDM)-can account for performance in a TI transfer task involving rapid decisions that deviate from standard accuracy and RT patterns. We trained six macaque monkeys on a TI transfer task, in which they learned the implied order of a novel list of seven images in each behavioral session, indicating their decisions with saccadic eye movements or reaching movements. Consistent learning of the list structure was achieved within 200-300 trials per session. Behavioral performance exhibited a symbolic distance effect, with accuracy increasing as the ordinal distance between items grew. Notably, RTs remained relatively stable across learning, despite improvements in accuracy. We applied a generalized DDM implementation (PyDDM) [Shinn, M., Lam, N. H., & Murray, J. D. A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models. eLife, 9, e56938, 2020] to jointly fit accuracy and RT data. Model fits were achieved by incorporating both an increasing evidence accumulation rate and a collapsing decision bound, successfully capturing the RT distribution shapes observed during learning. Learning and transfer were fit by varying drift rate with little change in other parameters. Eye and reaching movements showed similar dynamics, with the difference in RT accounted for mainly by nondecision time. Our results highlight a distinct dynamical regime of the DDM framework, extending its applicability to cognitive domains involving symbolic reasoning and serial relational learning.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

