Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Validity and reliability of Bahasa Malaysia Eating Assessment Tool (mEAT-10): A good screening tool for safe
Jia Ji Ng1, Hui Yan Ong2, Ziyad Al Harrasi3
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Jalan Langat, 41200 Klang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Bahasa Malaysia version of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (mEAT-10) and determine the cutoff point for abnormal swallowing.
Methods:
This prospective convenience sampling study was conducted at a tertiary center between December 2019 and May 2022. The mEAT-10 was produced following rigorous forward and backward translations. One hundred and thirty-eight participants, including 70 healthy volunteers and 68 patients with dysphagia, were recruited to complete the test-retest mEAT-10 assessment and the 3-ounce water test. The mEAT-10 was repeated within four weeks via telephone interviews or clinic visits. Patients in the dysphagia group underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The FEES results were evaluated independently by four different raters to determine the reliability of the penetration-aspiration score (PAS) scoring, which categorizes them into safe and unsafe swallowing for data analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest agreement were assessed using Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mEAT-10 comparison between the normal and dysphagia groups was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The association between PAS and mEAT-10, gag reflex,3-ounce water test and the other risk factors were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher exact test, with univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
The mEAT-10 test-retest showed a Cronbach alpha of >0.90 and an ICC of >0.85. The mEAT-10 cutoff score indicating abnormal swallowing is seven, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.82 and 0.54, respectively. In univariable analysis, higher mEAT-10 scores (≥7), absence of gag reflex, and failure of the 3-ounce water test were all significantly associated with unsafe swallowing (PAS ≥3). In multivariable logistic regression, however, failure of the 3-ounce water test was the only independent predictor of unsafe swallowing (PAS ≥3; adjusted odds ratio 4.24, 95% confidence interval 1.53-11.77; p=0.006).
Conclusion:
mEAT-10 is a reliable tool for screening and assessing patients with dysphagia. A cutoff score of 7 or more indicates abnormal swallowing and maybe associated with unsafe swallowing (PAS ≥3).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

