Commentary on methodological rigor in "Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
Arun Kumar1,2, Ankur Sharma3, Saumya Das4
1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India.
Abstract:
Kalhor et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on predictors of exclusive breastfeeding, offering valuable insights but facing methodological challenges. Despite a robust search strategy, PROSPERO registration, and use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, heterogeneity remained high (I² >85%), with limited exploration through prediction intervals. Combining diverse designs and minimal subgroup justification reduced interpretability. Future reviews should incorporate prediction intervals, sensitivity analyses, and clearer subgroup rationale to enhance methodological transparency and reproducibility.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Regression Toward the Mean
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...


