Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Double Reverse Traction-Assisted Versus Traditional Freehand Closed Reduction With Hexapod External Fixator in
Zhiming Zhao1, Yuanyuan Geng2, Bowen Shi1
1Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
The double reverse traction-assisted (DRTA) technique for open tibial shaft fractures (OTSFs) significantly reduces fracture reduction and fluoroscopy time compared to traditional freehand reduction. While not statistically significant, the DRTA technique showed a trend toward fewer complications, offering a promising alternative for improved efficiency and accuracy in fracture management.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Trauma care
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Open tibial shaft fractures (OTSFs) present complex challenges due to high-energy trauma, soft tissue damage, and infection risks.
- Conventional freehand reduction techniques for OTSFs can be inefficient, leading to increased soft tissue injury and radiation exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a double reverse traction-assisted (DRTA) technique for closed reduction of OTSFs managed with hexapod external fixators (HEFs).
- To compare the DRTA technique with traditional freehand reduction in terms of reduction accuracy, efficiency, and complication rates.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study of 55 patients with AO/OTA type 42-A or 42-B OTSFs treated with HEF.
- Patients were divided into two groups: DRTA (n=28) and Freehand (n=27).
- Data collected included reduction time, fluoroscopy time, external fixation duration, radiographic outcomes, postoperative corrections, and complications, assessed using ASAMI criteria.
Main Results:
- The DRTA group showed significantly shorter fracture reduction time (12.13 min vs. 17.14 min) and fluoroscopy time (8.12 min vs. 13.75 min) compared to the Freehand group (p < 0.001).
- Superior radiographic alignment was observed in the DRTA group, with significantly reduced residual translation and angulation (p < 0.05).
- The DRTA group had a lower electronic prescription count for postoperative correction (0.9 vs. 1.4; p < 0.05) and a nonsignificant trend toward lower complication rates (32.1% vs. 48.1%).
Conclusions:
- Both reduction techniques yielded favorable outcomes, but the DRTA technique demonstrated enhanced efficiency and accuracy in fracture reduction.
- The DRTA technique is a feasible and promising alternative for managing OTSFs, potentially reducing complications.
- Larger, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively confirm the advantages of the DRTA technique.
More Related Videos
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
08:20A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
Published on: March 24, 2019