Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

20.6K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
20.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Xian-Lian-Jie-Du Decoction suppresses colorectal cancer liver metastasis by inhibiting Plaur/Hbegf/EGFR-mediated actin cytoskeleton remodeling.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2026
Same author

Bridging data and discovery: a survey on knowledge graphs in AI for science.

National science review·2026
Same author

Integrated UPLC-QTOF-MS and Network Pharmacology for Predicting Active Constituents and Pharmacological Mechanisms of Yinxingye Tablets Against Oxidative Stress.

Biomedical chromatography : BMC·2026
Same author

Metabolomics Integrated with Mass Spectrometry Imaging Reveals Novel Action of Rb1 in Ischemic Stroke.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Harnessing biosynthetic logic for next-generation ADC payloads.

Chemical Society reviews·2026
Same author

Transformer-based graphs for drug-drug interaction with chemical knowledge embedding.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Spinal cord injury induces acute microbiome shock and system-wide transcriptomic reprogramming.

iMeta·2026
Same journal

Chondroitin sulfate restores muscle mass via gut-muscle axis remodeling through sugar-bile acid metabolism reprogramming.

iMeta·2026
Same journal

A large-scale single-cell transcriptomic atlas indicates the immune panorama of influenza A infection.

iMeta·2026
Same journal

Accu16S/AccuITS: Accurate and broadly applicable amplicon sequencing for absolute microbiome quantification.

iMeta·2026
Same journal

Chromatin unwinding state for in situ identification and lineage tracing of circulating tumor cells.

iMeta·2026
Same journal

Two stable gut microbiome guilds predict liver tumor class and treatment responses.

iMeta·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Mining Spatial Transcriptomics Datasets using DeepSpaceDB
10:16

Mining Spatial Transcriptomics Datasets using DeepSpaceDB

Published on: September 5, 2025

613

A comprehensive benchmarking for spatially resolved transcriptomics clustering methods across variable technologies,

Renjie Chen1,2, Yue Yao1,2, Jingyang Qian1,2

  • 1Pharmaceutical Informatics Institute, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.

Imeta
|December 31, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks 14 spatial clustering methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics. It reveals method-specific strengths and provides guidance for selecting tools based on technology, organ, and replicates.

Keywords:
benchmarking analysispreprocessing pipelinespatial clusteringspatially resolved transcriptomicssystematic comparison

More Related Videos

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

5.3K
Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

309

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Mining Spatial Transcriptomics Datasets using DeepSpaceDB
10:16

Mining Spatial Transcriptomics Datasets using DeepSpaceDB

Published on: September 5, 2025

613
Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

5.3K
Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

309

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Spatial clustering is crucial for analyzing spatially resolved transcriptomics data.
  • Understanding tissue heterogeneity relies on accurate spatial clustering.
  • Limited systematic benchmarking exists for spatial clustering methods across diverse datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate 14 spatial clustering methods.
  • To assess method performance across various technologies, organs, and biological replicates.
  • To provide practical guidance for selecting appropriate spatial clustering tools.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 14 spatial clustering algorithms.
  • Utilized approximately 600 real-world and simulated datasets.
  • Simulated adjacent tissue slices and spatial neighborhood disruptions to assess biological replicate performance.

Main Results:

  • Identified method-specific strengths and preferences for different technologies and organs.
  • Demonstrated the influence of data characteristics, spatial patterns, and preprocessing on clustering outcomes.
  • Provided a systematic performance evaluation across diverse conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers practical benchmarking guidance for spatial clustering.
  • Researchers can select methods tailored to specific experimental contexts.
  • Enables more accurate analysis of tissue heterogeneity in spatially resolved transcriptomics.