Why Antinatalism and Procreative Beneficence Do Not Mix.
1Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Bioethics
|December 31, 2025
Summary
This study critiques the application of antinatalism to procreative ethics, finding it fundamentally incompatible with the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB). Emerging reproductive technologies also predominantly support pro-birth stances.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Philosophy of Reproduction
- Antinatalism Studies
Background:
- Marcus T. L. Teo proposed an antinatalist justification for the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB).
- This connection between antinatalism and PPB warrants critical examination.
- Understanding the ethical implications of procreative decisions is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate Teo's argument linking antinatalism and PPB.
- To demonstrate the untenability of applying antinatalism to support PPB.
- To analyze the relationship between reproductive technologies and procreative ethics.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of antinatalism and procreative ethics.
- Conceptual critique of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB).
- Examination of the ethical character of emerging reproductive technologies.
Main Results:
- PPB is identified as a fundamentally pronatalist principle, unrelated to antinatalist philosophy.
- The potential suffering averted by PPB is extremely limited.
- Emerging reproductive technologies are predominantly pronatalist, not antinatalist.
Conclusions:
- Teo's attempt to align antinatalism with PPB is philosophically untenable.
- Antinatalism's core tenet is that existence is never worth initiating due to inherent suffering.
- The ethical frameworks of reproduction and emerging technologies lean heavily towards pronatalism.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas I
1.8K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
1.8K
Teratogenicity
3.9K
The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
3.9K
Ethical Issues
2.0K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.0K
The Nativist Approach
348
The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to...
348
Altruism
42.3K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
42.3K
Inclusive Fitness
37.1K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
37.1K


