Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Palatable Western-style Cafeteria Diet as a Reliable Method for Modeling Diet-induced Obesity in Rodents
Published on: November 1, 2019
Consuming an unprocessed diet reduces energy intake: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial reveals a
Jeffrey M Brunstrom1, Mark Schatzker2, Peter J Rogers3
1Nutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Bristol Biomedical Research Centre: Nutrition Theme, University of Bristol, University Hospitals Bristol Education & Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Background:
In 2019, Hall et al. reported a randomized clinical trial showing that an ultraprocessed diet increases energy intake by ∼500 kcal/d compared with an unprocessed diet.
Objective:
This post-hoc analysis assessed whether participants selected meal components with specific nutritional characteristics and how this affected energy intake.
Methods:
Twenty weight-stable adults received an ad libitum ultraprocessed or unprocessed diet for 2 wk, followed by the alternate diet. ANOVA and t tests assessed diet effects; a linear mixed model assessed predictors of meal size.
Results:
With the unprocessed diet, participants selected components with a less-equal blend of energy from carbohydrate and fat ["blend index" difference; lunch = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.26), P< 0.0001, d = 0.76; dinner = 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.28), P< 0.0001, d = 0.71]. These components formed meals that had a lower blend index (less balanced) than ultraprocessed meals [lunch, F(1, 19) = 18.49, P < 0.0004, partial η2 = 0.493; dinner, F(1, 19) = 24.85, P < 0.0001, partial η2 = 0.57]. With the unprocessed diet, participants preferentially chose low-energy-dense components (<1.0 kcal/g, mostly fruits and vegetables), creating meals lower in energy (unprocessed = 719.4 ± 11.6 kcal compared with ultraprocessed = 829.5 ± 12.51 kcal), [F(1,19) = 14.9, P < 0.001, η2G = 0.0457], yet significantly larger (57%) by mass (unprocessed = 665.5 ± 10.74 g compared with ultraprocessed = 423.5 ± 8.03 g), [F(1,19) = 82.9, P < 0.001, η2G = 0.274]. Modeled together, low-energy-dense mass and blend index strongly predict observed energy intakes (r = 0.78, df = 1676, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Unprocessed meals may reduce energy intake because: 1) they have a less balanced carbohydrate-fat blend; and 2) they promote a form of nutritional intelligence whereby a compromise is struck between consuming calories and consuming micronutrients, which we refer to as "micronutrient deleveraging." This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03407053.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Food Intake
Energy Balance
Optimal Foraging
Self-Schemas
Confirmation Biases
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...

