Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Artificial intelligence-based assessment of central aortic haemodynamics using non-invasive pulse wave analysis in
Mathieu N Suleiman1, Oliver Dewald2, Helena Dreher3
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen , Erlangen, Bayern, Germany mathieu.suleiman@uk-erlangen.de.
Background:
Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a rare but significant pericardial disease resulting in impaired ventricular filling and heart failure symptoms, often following cardiac surgery. Its clinical presentation complicates diagnosis, mimicking other causes of heart failure. Recent technological advances, including artificial intelligence (AI)-based non-invasive pulse wave analysis (AI-PWA), have the potential for improved haemodynamic assessment and clinical decision-making.
Objectives:
This study evaluates the clinical utility of AI-PWA in assessing central aortic blood pressure (CABP), arterial stiffness and cardiac function in CP.
Methods:
This prospective case-control study enrolled 12 adult CP patients and 12 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. CABP and peripheral blood pressure (PBP) were measured using the VascAssist2. Haemodynamic parameters, including pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index@75 (AIx@75), cardiac index, stroke volume and dP/dtmax, were assessed and compared between groups.
Results:
CP patients showed significantly lower mean CABP than systolic PBP (101.8±23.4 mm Hg vs 112.3±22.9 mm Hg). PWV showed elevated values (>9 m/s) in nnn (42%) of cases, indicating increased arterial stiffness (8.88±1.94 m/s). AIx@75 was higher in CP patients (22.55±8.36%) compared with controls (16.38±6.53%), reflecting increased wave reflection, increased systemic vascular resistance or enhanced aortic compliance. Cardiac performance was notably impaired in the CP group, with reduced stroke volume (64.8±18.8 mL vs 94.9±25.0 mL, p=0.003) and dP/dtmax (724.9±228.2 mm Hg/s vs 1055.3±203.2 mmHg/s, p=0.0011), indicating impaired ventricular function. The heart failure index was significantly higher in CP patients (31.8±18.3% vs . 6.4±6.5%, p<0.001), indicating substantial functional compromise.
Conclusion:
AI-PWA provides clinically relevant insights into central haemodynamics and arterial stiffness in CP patients. This non-invasive approach may enhance diagnosis and management of CP and should be considered for integration into routine cardiologic evaluation protocols.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:

