Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Improving MASLD Risk Stratification in Young Adults with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Insulin Resistance
Anu Sharma1, Eddison Godinez Leiva1, Srilaxmi Kalavalapalli1
1Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is less reliable for young adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) and insulin resistance (IR) improve fibrosis risk stratification in this group.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
Background:
- The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is recommended for identifying significant fibrosis in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
- FIB-4's reliability is reduced in younger adults (under 45 years).
- Cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) and insulin resistance (IR) are common in MASLD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if CMRFs or IR enhance MASLD fibrosis risk stratification in young adults.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of FIB-4, CMRFs, and IR in young adults with MASLD.
Main Methods:
- Adults screened for significant liver fibrosis (≥F2) using vibration-controlled transient elastography.
- Magnetic resonance elastography or liver biopsy used for diagnosis confirmation.
- Analysis included assessment of FIB-4 index, CMRFs (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obesity), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).
Main Results:
- In young adults, absence of CMRFs or IR indicated a low likelihood of significant fibrosis (NPV 97-100%).
- FIB-4 index showed low sensitivity (15%) but high specificity (97%) for significant fibrosis in young adults.
- Combining CMRFs with HOMA-IR improved risk stratification compared to CMRFs alone (sensitivity 75% to 78%, specificity 75% to 81%).
Conclusions:
- In young adults, the absence of CMRFs or IR suggests clinically significant fibrosis is unlikely.
- Measuring IR improves risk stratification when CMRFs are present in young adults.
- Combining CMRFs with IR may enhance the detection of significant liver fibrosis in younger populations.
More Related Videos
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures