Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Description of a Swine Infant Model of Volume-Controlled Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: November 3, 2023
The Effect of Methylene Blue on Sublingual Microcirculation in Patients with Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled
Cuicui Dong1, Jiaqi Zhu1, Hang Ni1
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Methylene blue (MB) has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy in the early management of septic shock; however, its effects on microcirculatory function remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate whether MB infusion improves sublingual microcirculatory parameters in patients with septic shock.
Methods:
In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the MB group or the control group. The MB group received an intravenous bolus of 2 mg/kg MB over 15 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg MB diluted in 500 mL of 0.9% saline via a central venous catheter for 12 hours. The control group received an equivalent volume of saline. The primary endpoint was the change in sublingual microcirculation parameters from baseline to 24 hours, assessed using a repeated-measures mixed-effects model. Secondary endpoints included 28-day organ support-free days and 28-day mortality.
Results:
Among the 72 randomized participants, 70.8% (n=51) were male, with a mean age of 68.6±13.5 years. Following MB treatment, the mean microvascular flow index (MFI) in the MB group was 2.78, compared to 2.51 in the control group. MMRM analysis demonstrated that MB significantly improved MFI (least squares mean difference [95% CI]: 0.21 [0.09, 0.33], P=0.001), with significant increases observed as early as 1 hour post-intervention (T1: 0.24 [0.06, 0.42], P=0.009), and this effect persisted up to 24 hours (T24: P=0.005). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in 28-day mortality (25.0% [9/36] vs 41.7% [15/36], P=0.200) or organ support-free days (20.0 [1.0-22.0] vs 16.0 [1.3-22.0], P=0.910).
Conclusions:
Although MB improved sublingual microcirculatory parameters, these improvements did not translate into benefits in organ function or survival outcomes.
Trial Registration:
chictr.org.cn ChiCTR 2400081549.
More Related Videos
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
08:45Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only Examination for Hypotensive Patients
Published on: April 18, 2025