Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

DNA Isolation

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...

Real Time RT-PCR

Real Time RT-PCR

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, or Real-time RT-PCR, is an analytical tool used to determine the expression level of target genes. The method involves converting mRNA to complementary DNA with the help of an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase, followed by the PCR amplification of the cDNA. These two processes can be performed simultaneously in a single tube or separately as a two-step reaction.
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer Carcinogenesis: The Evolution of Hypotheses].

Molekuliarnaia biologiia·2026

Same author

Leveraging two novel droplet-based single-cell RNA Sequencing platforms: a comparative study with 10x genomics.

BMC genomics·2025

Same author

[Clinical portrait of a patient with COVID-19. The experience of a multidisciplinary clinic].

Terapevticheskii arkhiv·2022

Same author

[TNFRSF13B gene mutation in adult patient with common variable immunodeficiency. Case report].

Terapevticheskii arkhiv·2022

Same author

[Frequency and risk factors for thromboembolic complications in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases].

Terapevticheskii arkhiv·2022

Same author

[Brainstem arachnoid cyst: case report and review].

Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

[Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Fecal Samples: Statistical Analysis of Commercial Kits and

A S Kurnosov^1,2, N N Linde^1,3, P A Molodtsova¹

¹Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks, Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Moscow, 119121 Russia.

Molekuliarnaia Biologiia

|January 1, 2026

Summary

Choosing the right DNA extraction method is crucial for reliable gut microbiome research. Mechanical lysis methods generally yield higher DNA, preserving taxonomic profiles better than chemical or enzymatic approaches.

Keywords:

DNA extraction extraction methods human gut microbiome laboratory standards mechanical lysis qPCR

More Related Videos

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: March 19, 2018

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Guided Protocol for Fecal Microbial Characterization by 16S rRNA-Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: March 19, 2018

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Microbiology
Genomics
Bioinformatics

Background:

Microbiome research is rapidly expanding due to links between gut microbiota composition and human diseases.
DNA extraction method selection is a critical step impacting microbiome study reliability and reproducibility.

Purpose of the Study:

To comparatively analyze 12 DNA extraction methods (9 commercial kits, 3 lab protocols) for gut microbiota.
To evaluate taxonomic representation, DNA yield, and loss of low-abundance taxa.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of 12 DNA extraction methods.
Assessment of extraction efficiency via DNA yield (GE/µL).
Evaluation of taxonomic representation for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Main Results:

Mechanical lysis methods yielded higher DNA, especially for Gram-positive bacteria, compared to chemical/enzymatic methods.
QIAamp® PowerFecal® Pro DNA Kit and AmpliTest UniProb + AmpliTest RIBO-prep kits showed superior DNA yield.
QIAamp® Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit demonstrated minimal loss of low-abundance taxa.

Conclusions:

Lysis type and sample pre-processing are key factors in DNA extraction efficiency and taxonomic profile preservation.
Findings support standardization of gut microbiota DNA extraction protocols.
Recommendations provided for selecting optimal methods for microbiome studies.