Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Hybrid PET/MRI Imaging of Alzheimer's Disease Based on 18F-AV-1451
Published on: April 18, 2025
Plasma Aβ42/40 predicts progression from Aβ-amyloid negative to positive PET scans
Azadeh Feizpour1, Vincent Doré2, Pierrick Bourgeat3
1Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, 30 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Background:
The agreement between plasma Aβ42/40 and Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) is approximately 75 %, with ∼85 % of discrepancies due to positive plasma but negative PET results. It is unclear whether this reflects Aβ changes in plasma before PET-detectable.
Objectives:
To assess the influence of Aβ42/40 positivity on risk of progression to Aβ PET positivity, and feasibility of using plasma Aβ42/40 tests to enrich a primary prevention trial.
Design:
A prospective longitudinal cohort study.
Setting:
Participants of Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle study (AIBL), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and Open Access Series of Imaging Studies 3 (OASIS3).
Participants:
507 cognitively unimpaired adults at baseline, with a baseline Aβ PET < 20 Centiloid (CL) and available longitudinal Aβ PET data.
Measurements:
Baseline Aβ PET and plasma Aβ42/40 measurement by mass-spectrometry, followed by 1-6 additional Aβ PET scans every 1.5-3 years. Those < 5 CL were classified as PET- and 5-20 CL as PETLow. Plasma -/+ was defined using the Aβ42/40 Youden's Index threshold (0.119), corresponding to Aβ PET status.
Results:
At baseline, 283 were Plasma-/PET-, 97 Plasma+/PET-, 76 Plasma-/PETLow, and 51 Plasma+/PETLow. Among Plasma+/PET- individuals, 19 % progressed to PET+ (>20 CL), indicating a higher risk of progression, compared to Plasma-/PET- (HR: 3.90 [90 % CI: 2.00-7.61], p < 0.001). This elevated risk remained significant after matching the groups' baseline CL (3.43 [1.43-8.26], p = 0.010), or adjustment for age, sex, APOE ε4 and baseline CL (2.48 [1.22 - 5.07], p = 0.013). Plasma+/PET- individuals accumulated Aβ ∼8 times faster (1.14 CL/year) than Plasma-/PET- (0.15 CL/year, p < 0.001). Plasma+/PET- progressors became PET+ two years earlier than Plasma-/PET- progressors. Among the Plasma+/PETLow individuals, 67 % progressed to PET+. Their progression was faster and earlier than in the Plasma-/PETLow group (HR: 20.82 [11.28 - 38.42], p < 0.001 vs. 6.67 [3.51 - 12.65], p < 0.001; reference: Plasma-/PET-), largely driven by higher baseline CL in the Plasma+ group. In a primary prevention paradigm targeting high-risk PETLow individuals, pre-screening with Aβ42/40 blood test reduced the number of PET scans by 49 %, compared to a PET-only strategy.
Conclusions:
Cognitively unimpaired individuals with abnormal Aβ42/40 are at increased risk for future Aβ PET positivity. In the 5-20 CL subgroup, baseline CL is the main driver of this risk. Combining blood-based pre-screening with PET imaging may help efficiently enrich primary prevention trials.
More Related Videos
08:25Detecting Amyloid-β Accumulation via Immunofluorescent Staining in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: April 19, 2021
09:31Visualization of Amyloid β Deposits in the Human Brain with Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 7, 2019