Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
Individualized Prognostic Counseling for Decision-Making in Head and Neck Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
Maarten C Dorr1, Arta Hoesseini1, Aniel Sewnaik1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Individualized prognostic counseling improved decision-making for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, reducing decisional conflict and regret. This approach enhances patient engagement and shared decision-making in complex cancer treatment choices.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Decision Sciences
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Managing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) requires balancing prognosis and quality of life.
- The impact of individualized prognostic counseling on patient decision-making in HNSCC is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between individualized prognostic counseling and the decision-making process in primary HNSCC patients.
- To assess the effect of an online prognostic model on decisional conflict and patient roles in treatment choice.
Main Methods:
- Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial with sequential cohorts at an academic tertiary referral center.
- Cohort 1 received standard care; Cohort 2 received standard care plus individualized prognostic counseling via an online model.
- Decisional Conflict Scale, Control Preferences Scale, decisional regret, treatment choice, and quality of life were primary and secondary outcomes.
Main Results:
- Individualized prognostic counseling was associated with lower decisional conflict in both small laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SLSCC) and other HNSCC groups.
- Decisional regret decreased at 3-6 months post-counseling, with small to moderate improvements observed.
- An association was found between individualized counseling and more active/shared decision-making roles in the other HNSCC group; no significant quality-of-life differences were noted.
Conclusions:
- Individualized prognostic counseling, particularly using an online model, improves decisional conflict and regret in HNSCC patients.
- This approach promotes more active and shared decision-making roles, enhancing patient engagement.
- Integrating individualized prognostic information into routine care may optimize treatment choices and reduce patient uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials: Overview
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

