Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Ultraprecision therapy for type 1 vs type 2 CALR+ MPN by dual epitope targeting that restores ruxolitinib sensitivity
Chloe Al Thompson-Peach1, Daniel Thomas1, Mara Dottore2
1Cancer Program, Precision Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, and School of Medicine, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract:
Somatic frameshift mutations in the gene encoding calreticulin (CALR) give rise to myelofibrosis and are classified as type 1 (del52) or type 2 (ins5) according to the degree of wild-type sequence retained adjacent to the neopeptide, with each type conferring different clinical outcomes. Targeting strategies specific for type 1 vs type 2 mutations would have enormous clinical utility in the treatment and prevention of myelofibrosis as responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors are not durable nor mutation specific. Here, we show that dual targeting of type 1 (del52) mutant CALR with 2 monoclonal antibodies directed against distinct epitopes in CALR have significant advantages compared with single-agent treatment in the eradication of primary megakaryocyte progenitors in vitro and in a humanized ossicle microenvironment leading to improved survival in xenograft models. Dual targeting was superior in blocking constitutive STAT5 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation induced by del52 and prevented accumulation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) phosphorylation, overcoming ruxolitinib resistance. In contrast, type 2 mutations showed increased CALR dimerization and were partially resistant to antibody targeting but could be affected by a ruxolitinib triple combination. Together, our data demonstrate an ultraprecision medicine approach tailored to either type 1 or type 2 mutation classes will be required for maximal efficacy and complete blockade of JAK/STAT signaling, with far-reaching implications for patient management.
Insights
Targeting specific calreticulin (CALR) mutations with dual antibodies eradicates myelofibrosis progenitors and improves survival. This precision medicine approach offers superior efficacy over single treatments for Type 1 mutations.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Somatic frameshift mutations in calreticulin (CALR) are key drivers of myelofibrosis.
- CALR mutations are classified as Type 1 (del52) or Type 2 (ins5), each with distinct clinical implications.
- Current treatments like tyrosine kinase inhibitors lack specificity and durability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of dual antibody targeting strategies specific for Type 1 versus Type 2 CALR mutations.
- To evaluate the potential for ultra-precision medicine in treating myelofibrosis.
Main Methods:
- In vitro studies using primary megakaryocyte progenitors.
- In vivo studies in a humanized ossicle microenvironment and xenograft models.
- Assessment of STAT5, ERK, and JAK2 phosphorylation.
- Evaluation of CALR dimerization and response to antibody therapy and ruxolitinib.
Main Results:
- Dual antibody targeting of Type 1 (del52) CALR mutant showed superior eradication of megakaryocyte progenitors and improved survival in xenograft models compared to single-agent therapy.
- Dual targeting effectively blocked constitutive STAT5 and ERK phosphorylation and prevented JAK2 phosphorylation, overcoming ruxolitinib resistance.
- Type 2 mutations exhibited increased CALR dimerization and partial resistance to antibody targeting, but were impacted by a ruxolitinib triple combination.
Conclusions:
- Ultra-precision medicine approaches tailored to specific CALR mutation types (Type 1 or Type 2) are necessary for maximal efficacy in myelofibrosis treatment.
- Targeted strategies can achieve complete blockade of JAK/STAT signaling, offering improved patient management and therapeutic outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

