Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Identifying direct risk factors in UK Biobank via simultaneous Bayesian-frequentist model-averaged hypothesis testing
Nicolas Arning1, Helen R Fryer1, Daniel J Wilson1,2
1Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
This study used a novel Doublethink method to identify nongenetic risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization from UK Biobank data. It found aging, dementia, and prior infection were significant direct risk factors, highlighting an agnostic exposome-wide approach.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Statistical Genetics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Traditional epidemiological studies often focus on candidate risk factors, potentially introducing bias and overlooking novel associations.
- Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) excel at identifying genetic risk factors, but nongenetic risk factor discovery using big data lags.
- Modern biobanks offer vast potential risk factor data, necessitating advanced analytical methods to avoid bias and control for multiple testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement a Doublethink-based exposome-wide association study (EWAS) to identify direct nongenetic risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization.
- To leverage the UK Biobank dataset comprising 201,917 participants and 1,912 potential risk factors.
- To simultaneously control Bayesian False Discovery Rate (FDR) and frequentist Familywise Error Rate (FWER) using a novel hypothesis testing approach.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a Doublethink model-averaged hypothesis testing approach, incorporating Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for analysis.
- Conducted an exposome-wide association study on 1,912 variables within the UK Biobank cohort.
- Focused on COVID-19 hospitalization data from the 2020 outbreak.
Main Results:
- Identified nine individual and seven groups of variables as exposome-wide significant for COVID-19 hospitalization.
- Found significant direct effects for factors including aging, dementia, and prior infection, alongside common factors like age, sex, and obesity.
- Observed that effects of hypertension, depression, and diabetes appeared mediated through general comorbidity, while cardiovascular disease did not show significant direct effects.
Conclusions:
- The Doublethink approach provides a powerful, agnostic method for identifying direct risk factors in large biobanks, controlling both Bayesian FDR and frequentist FWER.
- Overlooked factors like aging and dementia emerged as significant direct risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalization.
- This joint Bayesian-frequentist hypothesis testing framework offers flexible post hoc analysis and highlights the benefits of an unbiased, exposome-wide discovery strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests

