Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Comparison of FRACTURE MRI, Conventional Radiography, and CT in the Evaluation of Bone Tumors
Amit Kumar Janu1,2, Pranjal Rai1,3, Amit Jayant Choudhari1
1Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Abstract:
Purpose To evaluate the intermodality and interobserver agreement of fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE) MRI with conventional radiography and CT in assessing bone tumors. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with histopathologically confirmed bone tumors who underwent FRACTURE MRI and radiography over a 10-month period; a subset also underwent CT. Two independent readers assessed lesion features across modalities, with agreement calculated using Cohen κ. Results Among 161 patients (median age, 18 years [IQR, 13.5-31]; 95 male), FRACTURE showed near-perfect/perfect agreement with conventional radiography for lesion type (κ = 0.96 and 0.86, for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively) and treatment response (κ = 1.00, 1.00), near-perfect/substantial agreement for both fractures (κ = 0.95, 0.76) and lesion location (κ = 0.95, 0.79), and near-perfect/moderate agreement for matrix content (κ = 0.89, 0.56). Agreement was substantial for extraosseous soft tissue (κ = 0.74, 0.65) and osteochondral defects (κ = 0.75, 0.75) and moderate for lesion margins (κ = 0.42, 0.59). Cortical integrity showed moderate to near-perfect agreement (range, κ = 0.46-0.85) and periosteal reactions fair to near-perfect agreement (range, κ = 0.34-0.91), depending on subtype and reader. In the CT subset (n = 69), FRACTURE maintained near-perfect/perfect agreement for lesion type (κ = 0.90, 0.84), location (κ = 1.00, 0.94), extraosseous soft tissue (κ = 0.96, 0.85), fractures (κ = 0.95, 0.96), treatment response (κ = 1.00, 1.00), and osteochondral defects (κ = 1.00, 1.00). Near-perfect/substantial agreement was present for matrix content (κ = 0.81, 0.61). Cortical integrity and periosteal reaction showed fair to near-perfect agreement (range, κ = 0.25-0.81, 0.33-0.91). Conclusion FRACTURE MRI demonstrated high agreement with radiography and CT in evaluating most bone tumor features. Keywords: Conventional Radiography, MR Imaging, Skeletal-Appendicular, FRACTURE Sequence, 3D T1 GRE, Bone Tumors, MRI, Osteosarcoma Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026.
More Related Videos
07:33In Vivo Evaluation of Fracture Callus Development During Bone Healing in Mice Using an MRI-compatible Osteosynthesis Device for the Mouse Femur
Published on: November 14, 2017
06:44Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
X-ray Imaging