Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

225
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
225
Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

8.9K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of In-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights from a Medical Intensive Care Unit.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Ventilator Liberation for Hospitalized Patients With Tracheostomy.

Respiratory care·2026
Same author

Neuroanatomical correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction in pediatric pharmacoresistant epilepsy due to focal cortical dysplasia type II.

Epilepsia open·2026
Same author

Clinical use and radiological yield of magnetic resonance fingerprinting in epilepsy.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Heart failure outcomes in a virtually run hospital-at-home setting.

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes·2026
Same author

Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy vs. Electromagnetic Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy-A Comparative Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Enhancing Study Design and Analysis of MR Imaging Markers Through Measurement Error Modeling.

Xiaofeng Wang1, Walter Zhao2,3, Yifan Wang1

  • 1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|January 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a dual data collection design and regression calibration to correct measurement errors in brain imaging. This method improves statistical power and reliability in multi-site studies.

Keywords:
MR fingerprintingclinical trialsmeasurement errorpower analysisquantitative imagingstatistical analysis

More Related Videos

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

20.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K
Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
09:30

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease

Published on: December 18, 2016

20.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Measurement error in medical imaging studies can reduce statistical power and bias results.
  • This compromises the reliability and accuracy of neuroimaging research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a dual data collection design to quantify measurement error in imaging.
  • To apply regression calibration to correct for error-prone imaging markers.
  • To improve biomarker-outcome estimation, statistical power, and sample size planning in neuroimaging studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a prospective reliability dataset and a retrospective main dataset.
  • Employed regression calibration with MR fingerprinting (MRF) T1 and T1-weighted (T1w) MPRAGE sequences.
  • Assessed reliability coefficients and applied corrections in an epilepsy cohort, with simulations for multi-site scenarios.

Main Results:

  • MRF T1 markers showed higher reliability (λ=0.887-0.941) than T1w SI markers (λ=0.246-0.554).
  • Regression calibration significantly increased effect sizes, particularly for T1w SI mean (333.22%).
  • Combined regression calibration and Combat effectively reduced bias in multi-site simulations with larger site effects.

Conclusions:

  • The dual data acquisition and regression calibration approach enhances the reliability and generalizability of multi-site neuroimaging studies.
  • This method effectively restores attenuated imaging biomarker associations and improves statistical power.
  • The findings provide a framework for optimizing sample size and study design in neuroimaging research.