Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Angiography-Derived Index of Microvascular Resistance in Patients With Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial
Ciro Pollio Benvenuto1, Domenico Galante2, Frederik Zimmermann3
1Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Insights
A new angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (AngioIMR) shows promise for predicting adverse outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). An AngioIMR of 43 or higher indicates a significantly increased risk of major adverse cardiac events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
Background:
- Microvascular dysfunction is a key factor in adverse outcomes for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
- The invasive Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) is prognostic but limited by its reliance on thermodilution.
- Angiography-derived indices offer a potential non-invasive alternative for assessing microvascular function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic performance of the angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (AngioIMR) in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
- To determine if AngioIMR can effectively stratify risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 180 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
- Calculation of AngioIMR using the formula: AngioIMR = MAP × QFR × TFC.
- Assessment of a composite primary endpoint (all-cause death, target vessel MI, heart failure hospitalization) and a secondary endpoint (including angina hospitalization) over a 5-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- An optimal AngioIMR cut-off of 43 was identified (AUC 0.800).
- Patients with AngioIMR ≥ 43 had significantly higher rates of primary (18.9% vs. 1.9%) and secondary (28.4% vs. 1.9%) endpoints (p < 0.001).
- AngioIMR ≥ 43 was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (HR: 9.5; p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- AngioIMR is a promising, non-invasive tool for assessing microvascular function in STEMI patients.
- AngioIMR can effectively stratify prognosis and identify patients at high risk for adverse cardiovascular events after pPCI.
- Routine use of AngioIMR could improve risk stratification and patient management in STEMI care.
Abstract:
Microvascular dysfunction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is a well-established determinant of adverse outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Although the invasive Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) has demonstrated prognostic value, its reliance on thermodilution limits its routine applicability. Angiography-derived functional indices, already validated in the epicardial domain, may offer a simplified, non-invasive alternative for microvascular assessment. To evaluate the prognostic performance of the angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (AngioIMR), we retrospectively analyzed 180 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for anterior STEMI at Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, between January 1, 2016, and February 1, 2024. AngioIMR was computed using the formula: AngioIMR = MAP × QFR × TFC. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for heart failure. The secondary endpoint additionally included hospitalization for angina. Over a 5-years follow-up, primary and secondary endpoints occurred in 16 (8.9%) and 23 (13%) patients, respectively. The optimal AngioIMR cut-off was 43 (AUC 0.800; 95% CI: 0.714-0.887; p <0.001), with sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 63.4%, PPV 18.9%, and NPV 98.1%. The incidence of both the primary and secondary endpoints were significantly higher in patients with AngioIMR ≥ 43: 18.9% versus 1.9% (p <0.001) and 28.4% versus 1.9% (p <0.001), respectively. AngioIMR ≥ 43 was associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes (HR: 9.5; 95% CI: 2.2-42.0; p <0.001), and remained an independent predictor at multivariable analysis. In conclusion, AngioIMR may be a promising tool to stratify prognosis in patients with STEMI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

