Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

A Hyperandrogenic Mouse Model to Study Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Published on: October 2, 2018
Healthcare Costs Associated With Anabolic Steroid Use: A Cohort Study.
Henrik Horwitz1,2, Renée Hangaard Olesen3, Josefine Windfeld-Mathiasen1,2
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) users incur significantly higher healthcare costs than the general population. This study found AAS users had 45% greater healthcare expenditures, primarily driven by hospital care.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use is linked to health risks, but its economic impact on healthcare systems is not well understood.
- Understanding the financial burden of AAS use is crucial for resource allocation and public health policy.
- Previous research has focused on health outcomes, with limited data on direct healthcare costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the direct healthcare costs associated with anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use.
- To compare healthcare expenditures between AAS users and a matched general population cohort.
- To quantify the excess healthcare costs attributable to AAS use over a 10-year period.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide register-based study in Denmark (2006-2017).
- Inclusion of 1183 males sanctioned for AAS use and 59,150 matched controls.
- Calculation of healthcare costs including primary care, hospital services, and prescription drugs.
Main Results:
- AAS users incurred significantly higher total healthcare costs, with a mean excess of €3299 per person over the follow-up period.
- This represents a 45% increase in costs compared to controls, averaging €537 more per AAS user annually.
- The cost difference was mainly driven by hospital care but also observed in primary care and prescription medication use, increasing steadily over time.
Conclusions:
- Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use is associated with a substantial and sustained increase in direct healthcare costs.
- The findings highlight a significant health burden and economic impact of AAS use, even in a relatively young population.
- Further long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the cumulative healthcare costs, considering potential delayed complications.
More Related Videos
05:55Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies