Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
The Predictive Value of the EGGIM Score for Extensive and Incomplete Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Implications for
Nhi Ai Trinh1, Mai Ngoc Luu2,3, Doan Thi Nha Nguyen2,3
1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Tan Tao University, Duc Hoa Commune, Tay Ninh Province, Vietnam.
Background:
Gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) is a precancerous lesion, with high-risk IM (i.e., extensive or incomplete types) posing the most significant risk for gastric cancer. The endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) was developed to predict the presence of IM; however, validation studies in Asian populations are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the EGGIM in predicting IM and high-risk IM among Vietnamese patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with IM assessment using the EGGIM score. All patients received systematic biopsies for histopathological evaluation. IM was classified as extensive if it was present in both the antrum and corpus. The IM subtype was determined using Alcian Blue and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. The predictive performance of the EGGIM for IM and high-risk IM was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
Results:
A total of 295 patients were included, with a median age of 51 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:2. The prevalence of IM was 37.3%, with 18.0% having high-risk IM (10.5% extensive and 13.9% incomplete). The EGGIM score demonstrated good predictive accuracy for IM (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.92, cutoff ≥ 1) and for high-risk IM (AUC = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97, cutoff ≥ 5).
Conclusion:
The EGGIM score accurately predicts both IM and high-risk IM. It may serve as a practical, noninvasive tool to guide biopsy decisions and identify patients at elevated risk of gastric cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:

