Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Implementation of a Hyperbolic Vortex Plasma Reactor for the Removal of Micropollutants in Water
Published on: July 25, 2025
Towards smart PFAS management: Integrating artificial intelligence in water and wastewater systems
Samaneh Yaghoobian1, Jinwoo An2, Dae-Woon Jeong3
1Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada.
None:
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly integrated into Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) research; however, the field remains fragmented with substantial variation in modeling objectives. This review provides one of the most comprehensive and detailed syntheses to date of AI/ML methods across the PFAS contamination management pipeline, comparing input features, dataset structure and scale, algorithmic choices, performance metrics, and interpretability strategies reported from 2019 to 2025. At the molecular level, advances in ML-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling, physics-informed descriptors, graph learning, transfer learning, and generative modeling for PFAS classification, toxicity screening, and chemical-space expansion are summarized. For PFAS detection and non-target identification, ML frameworks for spectral interpretation are evaluated. In source allocation, supervised and unsupervised models applied to concentration profiles across water, groundwater, and sediments, are compared, highlighting how model design depends on the availability of labeled data. ML-driven PFAS occurrence and risk prediction across diverse aqueous matrices are reviewed, including multilabel, multistage, and semi-supervised frameworks that capture cross-PFAS dependencies. PFAS removal processes are also assessed in terms of the ML models used for predicting removal efficiencies, interpreting mechanistic behavior, and optimizing operational conditions. Across all domains, tree-based ensembles, and neural networks achieve superior performance, while uncertainty quantification, classifier chains, transfer learning, and generative models address challenges related to sparse labels, chemical diversity, and analytical limitations. This review offers a practical reference for researchers and regulators and identifies priority directions for developing robust, and generalizable AI/ML frameworks to support PFAS contamination management.
More Related Videos
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Pipe Systems
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment