Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

198
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
198
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.9K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.8K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.8K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disentangling patterns of community malaria transmission and burden using malaria prevalence among pregnant women attending antenatal care: a modelling study.

The Lancet. Microbe·2026
Same author

The burden of malaria-attributable maternal anaemia and the impact of preventive treatment across sub-Saharan Africa.

Nature health·2026
Same author

The rising burden of small vulnerable newborns in China: demanding targeted interventions.

The Lancet. Global health·2026
Same author

Adiposity and reproductive characteristics across the lifespan: a multi-ethnic population-based study in Northwest China.

Reproductive health·2026
Same author

Maternal Dietary Anthocyanidin, Dietary Inflammatory Potential, and Risk of Small-for-Gestational-Age in China.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Association Between Anti-Inflammatory Diet, Dietary Diversity, and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Pregnant Women.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Cluster minimal sufficient balance (CMSB): an efficient covariate balancing randomization method for cluster

Jiaxin Cai1,2,3, Shanshan Suo3, Valirie Ndip4

  • 1Complex Systems Research Center, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|January 4, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Cluster Minimal Sufficient Balance (CMSB) enhances covariate balance in cluster randomized trials without compromising allocation randomness. This method improves efficiency and is suitable for complex, large-scale studies.

Keywords:
Cluster minimal sufficient balanceCluster randomized trialComputational efficiencyCovariates balanceRandomization

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) necessitate balanced baseline covariates for unbiased treatment effect estimation.
  • Existing randomization methods may trade off covariate balance for allocation randomness.
  • A novel method, Cluster Minimal Sufficient Balance (CMSB), is introduced to address these competing demands.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a new cluster randomization method, CMSB.
  • To enhance covariate balance while preserving allocation randomness and computational efficiency in CRTs.
  • To assess CMSB's performance against existing methods in various settings.

Main Methods:

  • CMSB combines dynamic imbalance monitoring with conditional biased randomization.
  • The method accommodates both continuous and categorical covariates.
  • Evaluated via simulations and an empirical application comparing CMSB with simple, block, stratified randomization, minimization, and constrained randomization.

Main Results:

  • CMSB significantly improved covariate balance (45% more than constrained randomization) in high-dimensional settings (10 covariates).
  • CMSB maintained near-optimal allocation randomness (49.79% correct guess probability).
  • CMSB drastically reduced allocation time (0.116 s/allocation) and showed a 76% balance improvement over simple randomization in an empirical case.

Conclusions:

  • CMSB effectively balances covariate balance, allocation randomness, and computational efficiency in CRTs.
  • The method's capacity for high-dimensional covariates makes it ideal for large-scale cluster randomized trials.