Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
Mean Arterial Pressure and Mortality in Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock With and Without Cardiac Arrest: A
S Ten Berg1, M Bogerd1, E J Peters1
1Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
This study found no significant difference in short-term mortality for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest (AMICS-CA) patients treated with different mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels. Similar results were observed for AMICS patients without cardiac arrest.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition.
- Cardiac arrest (CA) further complicates AMI with CS, increasing mortality risk.
- Optimizing hemodynamic management, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), is crucial for these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of varying MAP levels on short-term mortality in patients with AMI complicated by CS, with and without CA.
- To compare outcomes between low-MAP and high-MAP management strategies.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive systematic search of major medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL) was performed.
- Included studies reported short-term mortality for AMI patients with and without CA across different MAP groups (targeted or achieved).
- Data from 12 studies (4 RCTs, 8 observational) involving 1281 AMICS-CA and 111 AMICS patients without CA were pooled using random-effects models.
Main Results:
- In patients with AMI complicated by CS and CA (AMICS-CA), short-term mortality was similar between low- and high-MAP groups in both RCTs (34.9% vs. 39.4%) and observational data.
- For AMICS patients without CA, mortality also showed no significant difference between low- and high-MAP groups, though this was based on only two observational studies.
- The primary endpoint, short-term mortality, did not significantly differ based on MAP levels in either patient group.
Conclusions:
- The meta-analysis indicates no significant difference in short-term mortality between low- and high-MAP levels for AMICS-CA patients.
- Similarly, no significant mortality difference was observed in AMICS patients without CA, although evidence is limited.
- Heterogeneity in MAP definitions and limited evidence across studies preclude definitive conclusions regarding optimal MAP targets.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies

