Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Role of Diffusion MRI Tractography in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
Published on: July 5, 2021
Risk assessment of brain retraction injury based on quantitative evaluation of brain retraction distance during
Kei Yamashiro1, Takamichi Kozaki2, Hironori Fukumoto3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1, Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0810, Japan. keiyamashiro1577@gmail.com.
Objective:
In skull-base surgery, excessive brain retraction may cause brain retraction injury (BRI), yet the brain retraction distance (BRD) that contributes to BRI and the potential of skull-base approaches to reduce BRD remain unclear. This study used a virtual reality (VR)-based method to quantify BRD related to BRI and to assess the impact of skull-base approaches on reducing BRD.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients who underwent frontotemporal craniotomy for anterior skull-base tumors. Three-dimensional models were generated from perioperative imaging, and the frontal lobe was virtually elevated on the 3D model to reproduce the surgical exposure. BRD was estimated by comparing pre- and post-retraction configurations, and its association with BRI was assessed. Additionally, a virtual orbitotomy was performed to evaluate how much BRD could be reduced with this approach.
Results:
Four patients developed BRI. The median BRD was 6.2 mm in the non-BRI group, whereas it was 12.2 mm in the BRI group, demonstrating a significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 10.1 mm as the optimal cutoff value for predicting BRI, yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92.9%. The median BRD decreased from 8.3 mm to 5.8 mm after adding an orbitotomy on the 3D model, with the greatest reduction observed in cases requiring larger BRD.
Conclusion:
VR-based preoperative measurement of BRD may help assess both the risk of BRI and the potential benefit of skull-base approaches. This technique could support selecting an optimal surgical strategy by considering the anticipated BRD for each patient.

