Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.9K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.9K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

4.9K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strain-Level Food Surveillance of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Using a Specific-Nonspecific Hybrid Sensor Array Strategy.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Correction: Solvent-association regulated electrolyte enables high-rate lithium metal batteries at low-temperature.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Neuronal tetraspanin TSP-6 suppresses intestinal innate immunity by modulating dense-core vesicle release in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2026
Same author

Porous Core-Shell PU Composite Membrane with a AgNW Conductive Network for Electromagnetic Shielding.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Designing Single- and Dual-Band EIT-Like Meta-Biosensors with T-Shaped Resonators for Specific Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigens in the Terahertz Band.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Carbon dots/chitosan composite films with bimodal synergistic behavior for efficient preservation of fresh-cut fruits.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking the Robustness of Autonomous Driving to Environmental Illusions: A Lane Perception Perspective.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Learning Topology-Aware Representations via Test-Time Adaptation for Anomaly Segmentation.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

TraGraph-GS: Trajectory Graph-based Gaussian Splatting for Arbitrary Large-Scale Scene Rendering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

SWIFT: A Small-World Interaction Framework for Flow-Aware Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

HardFlow: Hard-Constrained Sampling for Flow-Matching Models Via Trajectory Optimization.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Industrial Brain: Self-Evolving Neuro-Symbolic Autonomy with Causal Resilience for Cyber-Physical Systems.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.0K

Revisiting Out-of-Distribution Detection in Real-Time Object Detection: From Benchmark Pitfalls to a New Mitigation

Changshun Wu, Weicheng He, Chih-Hong Cheng

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
    |January 6, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Out-of-distribution (OoD) inputs challenge deep learning models. This study reveals benchmark flaws and introduces a training-time method to reduce hallucination errors in object detection, significantly improving model robustness.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
    03:31

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    1.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Computer Science
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Deep learning models struggle with out-of-distribution (OoD) inputs, leading to overconfident predictions on incorrect objects.
    • Existing methods for OoD detection in object detection offer limited improvements by focusing on post-hoc scoring adjustments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address critical overlooked issues in OoD detection for object detection models.
    • To propose a novel training-time mitigation strategy to enhance model robustness against OoD inputs.

    Main Methods:

    • Analyzed widely used evaluation benchmarks, identifying significant data quality issues distorting performance metrics.
    • Introduced a training-time paradigm involving fine-tuning detectors with synthesized OoD datasets that mimic in-distribution objects.
    • Developed a method to suppress objectness for OoD objects, creating a more defensive decision boundary.

    Main Results:

    • Revealed up to 13% of objects in OoD test sets were mislabeled, impacting existing method evaluations.
    • Achieved a 91% reduction in hallucination error for a YOLO model on the BDD-100K dataset.
    • Demonstrated generalization across various object detection architectures (YOLO, Faster R-CNN, RT-DETR) and few-shot adaptation.

    Conclusions:

    • Current OoD detection benchmarks have fundamental flaws that inflate performance claims.
    • A training-time mitigation approach, independent of external detectors, effectively reduces OoD-induced hallucination.
    • The proposed methodology offers a principled and broadly applicable solution for improving object detector reliability.