Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

11:29
Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
15.2K
Influence of Tubal Patency on Endometriosis Recurrence: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study
Sofie Neutens1, Arne Vanhie2, Barbara Van Elst3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AZ Delta Hospital, Roeselare, Belgium (Dr. Neutens).
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
|January 6, 2026
Summary
This study investigated if blocked fallopian tubes correlate with lower endometriosis recurrence after surgery. No statistically significant reduction in recurrence was observed in patients with bilateral tubal non-patency.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Gynecologic Surgery
- Endometriosis Research
Background:
- Endometriosis recurrence is a significant clinical challenge.
- The role of fallopian tube patency in endometriosis recurrence is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between bilateral fallopian tube non-patency and endometriosis recurrence rates.
- To assess if absent or blocked fallopian tubes influence the likelihood of endometriosis returning after surgical excision.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study involving 896 patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis excision (2010-2014).
- Comparison of endometriosis recurrence rates between patients with bilateral tubal non-patency (n=49) and matched controls with patent tubes (n=98).
- Recurrence assessed by symptoms, imaging, and need for reintervention.
Main Results:
- Symptomatic recurrence was observed in 12.2% of cases vs. 25.5% of controls (P=0.09).
- Recurrence confirmed by imaging occurred in 8% of cases vs. 10.2% of controls (P=0.77).
- No statistically significant difference in reintervention rates or histological recurrence was found between groups.
Conclusions:
- The study did not find a statistically significant reduction in endometriosis recurrence associated with bilateral fallopian tube occlusion or absence post-surgery.
- A potential type II error may explain the lack of observed significant findings.

