Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
Sleeve material, height, and drill surface changes in guided endodontics: Vicker's hardness and scanning electron
Anna Muryani1,2, Dudi Aripin3, Hendra Dian Adhita Dharsono3
1Doctoral Programme Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. anna.muryani@unpad.ac.id.
Guided endodontic access drill wear was considerable, with most drills experiencing thermal damage and surface degradation. Zirconia sleeves, while harder, increased wear, suggesting a need for improved cooling during guided endodontic procedures.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Guided endodontic access utilizes CBCT-derived templates and guide sleeves for precise canal location, offering conservative and efficient treatment.
- Sleeve materials (zirconia, CoCr, titanium, resin) vary in hardness and durability, impacting drill wear and heat generation during endodontic procedures.
- Existing research lacks characterization of sleeve material and height effects on endodontic drill wear, a critical factor for tool longevity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of different guide sleeve materials and heights on endodontic drill wear.
- To assess drill surface changes, including thermal damage and abrasion, using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
- To determine the Vickers Hardness (HV) of various sleeve materials before and after simulated guided endodontic access drilling.
Main Methods:
- In vitro testing of 30 guide sleeves (3, 5, 7 mm heights; resin, Y-TZP, Co-Cr, Ti-6Al-4V materials) with a 1.5 mm carbide bur.
- Vickers Hardness Test (HV0.2) performed pre- and post-drilling; ANOVA used to analyze material and height effects (p<0.05).
- SEM imaging (1000x) of drill tips and flutes to assess wear (Grades 0-2); thermal discoloration (burn marks) noted.
Main Results:
- Zirconia sleeves exhibited the highest hardness (~1392 HV), while resin sleeves had the lowest (~7 HV); material type significantly affected hardness (p<0.001), but height did not (p>0.8).
- Significant drill wear (Grade 2) was observed in 60% of cases, with thermal damage (burn marks) present in five drills.
- Resin, zirconia, and CoCr sleeves, particularly longer ones, were associated with increased drill abrasion and Grade 2 wear, while short sleeves showed Grade 1 wear.
Conclusions:
- Sleeve material is the primary determinant of hardness, with zirconia being the hardest and potentially most wear-resistant.
- Considerable drill wear and thermal damage occurred with static sleeves, irrespective of material hardness.
- Optimized irrigation and intermittent drilling may be necessary to mitigate thermal and mechanical damage, especially with rigid guide sleeves, to ensure successful guided endodontic procedures.
More Related Videos
06:16Author Spotlight: Establishing an Accurate Microhardness Testing Protocol for Craniofacial Tissues
Published on: April 26, 2024
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024