Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

08:46
Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
6.5K
Fertility-sparing treatment for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma
Baolin Xu1,2,3,4, Yan You5, Huanwen Wu5
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan No. 1, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
European Journal of Medical Research
|January 6, 2026
Summary
Fertility-sparing surgery for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) increases recurrence risk but not mortality. Stage I patients seeking pregnancy show promising live birth rates despite higher recurrence.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Reproductive Endocrinology
- Surgical Oncology
Background:
- Oncologic outcomes for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) with fertility preservation are not well-established.
- This study addresses the prognosis of fertility-sparing surgeries and associated obstetrical outcomes in LGESS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the oncologic and fertility outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.
- To evaluate the impact of ovarian preservation on recurrence and survival in LGESS patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 135 patients with primary LGESS treated from February 2012 to June 2019.
- Follow-up until June 1, 2020, to assess fertility and oncologic outcomes, including recurrence and mortality.
- Comparative analysis of outcomes between patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery versus those who did not, and with versus without ovarian preservation.
Main Results:
- Fertility-sparing surgery (21 patients) and ovarian preservation (42 patients) were performed in 15.6% and 31.1% of LGESS cases, respectively.
- Significantly higher recurrence rates were observed in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery (47.6% vs. 15.8%) and ovarian preservation (42.9% vs. 10.8%).
- Fertility-sparing surgery and ovarian preservation increased recurrence risk (HR 3.5 and 5.2, respectively) in the overall cohort and stage I patients, with no increased mortality risk. Seven of nine patients attempting pregnancy achieved live births.
Conclusions:
- Fertility-sparing surgery for LGESS is associated with a significantly elevated risk of recurrence but does not increase mortality.
- Ovarian preservation in LGESS patients also correlates with a higher risk of recurrence.
- For stage I LGESS patients, fertility-sparing surgery demonstrates promising live birth rates, balancing reproductive desires with oncologic risks.

