Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Benchmarking AlphaMissense against ClinVar for Diagnostic Interpretation of Missense Variants in Inherited Retinal
Mark Lindquist1,2, Samson Darrah1,2,3, Stefan T Stafie1,2
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Purpose:
AlphaMissense is a newer deep learning-based variant predictor that evaluates the structural consequences of missense variants, the most common pathogenic variant type in inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of AlphaMissense in IRDs by assessing its concordance with ClinVar annotations and exploring how other variant-level metrics may refine its predictions.
Design:
A cross-sectional benchmarking study using public variant resources, with a single illustrative clinical case.
Participants:
Missense variants from 107 IRD genes; 1 patient case undergoing long-read sequencing.
Methods:
Pathogenicity scores from AlphaMissense were extracted from 128 248 variants present in both IRD genes and the Genome Aggregation Database. Among these, 4204 had definitive ClinVar classifications and were used to calculate AlphaMissense specificity, sensitivity, and false discovery rate (FDR). Population-based metrics, including allele frequency, homozygote count, and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion score, were analyzed to identify salient features that would be associated with discordance. Long-read sequencing was carried out in a monoallelic ABCA4 patient with late-onset macular dystrophy for phased variant analysis.
Main Outcome Measures:
Concordance between AlphaMissense predictions and ClinVar annotations was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and FDR. Variant-level metrics between discordant variants. Case-based reclassification of hypomorphic variants with long-read sequencing.
Results:
AlphaMissense achieved a specificity of 94.1% and sensitivity of 79.4% in IRD genes, with specificity reaching 100% in ABCA4, USH2A, RPGR, and PRPH2, which are 4 of the most common IRD genes. The FDR was 9.6%. AlphaMissense underperformed in predicting hypomorphic variants, particularly in ABCA4-associated Stargardt disease. Variant-level metrics were effective in identifying false negatives. In a clinical case, phased variant analysis identified a potential hypomorphic ABCA4 variant predicted as benign by AlphaMissense.
Conclusions:
AlphaMissense demonstrates high specificity for pathogenicity prediction in IRD-associated genes; however, its reduced sensitivity, as seen in hypomorphic variants, suggests a need to incorporate population and functional metrics scores, which may improve classification accuracy, especially as long-read sequencing enables phased variant analysis.
Financial Disclosures:
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
More Related Videos
06:41In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
08:04Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Mutations
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...
Point and Frameshift Mutations