Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Equal school meals for all - differentiation of school meals according to school social index
Cordula Hundeshagen1, Heike Rosmann1
1Food and Consumer Education, IES Landau, Institute of Environmental Sciences, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829, Landau, Germany.
Objectives:
The EU is discussing providing all children healthy food at least once a day through school lunch. In Germany, a School Food Standard (SFS) aims to ensure healthy and sustainable meals, however its implementation is mandatory in only some federal states, while voluntary in others. To address social disadvantages, some states use school social indices to allocate additional funding to disadvantaged schools. This study analyzes German school menus to assess their compliance with SFS requirements under both voluntary and mandatory implementation and examines whether healthy, sustainable lunches are accessible regardless of schools' socioeconomic status.
Study Design:
Exploratory school meal analysis.
Methods:
A random sample of schools was selected based on the school register and social index, and schools were invited to participate voluntarily. Menus from a state with obligatory (OSFS) and voluntary (VSFS) implementation of the SFS were collected and analyzed. The analysis focused on SFS criteria, including a mixed diet menu, ovo-lacto-vegetarian dishes and criteria for menu planning. Binomial logistic regression and two-step multiple regression models were used to assess the influence of the school social index on compliance with SFS requirements.
Results:
We analyzed 67 OSFS menus and 79 VSFS menus. No significant influence of the school social index on menu quality was observed. OSFS menus generally met SFS requirements to a greater extent and exhibited a healthier dietary pattern. OSFS menus included more grain products, vegetables, legumes, and salad, fruits, and fatty fish, while containing fewer potato products, fried items, and industrial meat substitutes. They also used more organic products and sustainably sourced fish and provided better labeling for animal species, meat substitutes, additives, and allergens. OSFS menus featured more ovo-lacto-vegetarian options and prioritized seasonal and regional products. However, OSFS menus were less tailored to target audiences, lacked nutritional information, and often failed to clearly describe meal components.
Conclusion:
Regardless of socioeconomic status, all students receive the same food. OSFS menus better fulfilled SFS requirements and are a healthier and more sustainable option. However, compliance remains incomplete, even in OSFS states. Further research is needed to address implementation barriers and ensure equitable access to healthy school meals.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
10:57Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Identity
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...