Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
Differences in the Use of Smokeless Tobacco, Alcohol, and Co-Use Among U.S. High-School Students: Analysis of
Ganna Kostygina1, Yoonsang Kim1, Alex Kresovich1
1Social Data Collaboratory, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Introduction:
This study was aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships and patterns of concurrent smokeless tobacco and alcohol use among U.S. high-school students, investigating whether demographic characteristics and behavioral factors differentially predict concurrent versus single substance use of smokeless tobacco or alcohol (referred to as either-alone use in the remaining parts of this paper).
Methods:
Analysis of nationally representative Youth Risk Behavior Survey data was perfomed, combining 3 cross-sectional surveys (2019, 2021, 2023) from 39,164 students in Grades 9-12. Logistic regression examined the bidirectional smokeless tobacco-alcohol associations, whereas multinomial models compared the characteristics of concurrent users, users of smokeless tobacco or alcohol alone, and nonusers.
Results:
The authors found a strong bidirectional relationship: smokeless tobacco users had 3.8 times higher odds of alcohol use than non-users, and similarly, alcohol users had 4.5 times higher odds of smokeless tobacco use than non-users, adjusting for covariates. This relationship was asymmetric: 84.5% of smokeless tobacco users reported alcohol use, whereas only 7.8% of alcohol users reported smokeless tobacco use. Males had lower odds of either-alone use but 2.2 times greater odds of concurrent use (relative to neither use) than females. Past-year sports participation was associated with smokeless tobacco use and alcohol use as well as concurrent use, with athletes showing 2.2 times higher odds of concurrent use relative to neither use and 1.4 times higher odds of concurrent use relative to either-alone use than nonathletes. Furthermore, combustible tobacco users and E-cigarette users were more likely to be concurrent smokeless tobacco and alcohol users.
Conclusions:
The strong yet asymmetric relationship suggests that smokeless tobacco users may be a crucial target for alcohol prevention. The distinct risk patterns for concurrent use-particularly among males and other tobacco users-indicate that prevention strategies should likely differ between concurrent and either-alone use. Results also suggest reconsidering how substance use prevention is approached in sports contexts, particularly given the strong association between athletic participation and concurrent smokeless tobacco and alcohol use.
More Related Videos
05:12Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
Published on: June 23, 2023
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Cross-Sectional Research
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine