Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Continuous versus Intermittent Midazolam Sedation in Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
Yuko Sakakibara1, Tomohiko Mannami2, Toshio Kuwai3
1Department of Gastroenterology, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan, yuko.sb@gmail.com.
Continuous midazolam infusion for balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) did not improve sedation time compared to intermittent bolus. However, continuous infusion reduced patient movement during BAE without increasing adverse events, offering a feasible sedation option.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Anesthesiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Sedation protocols for balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) lack standardization.
- Midazolam is commonly used for BAE sedation, but administration methods vary.
- Comparing continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus midazolam is crucial for optimizing BAE procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of continuous midazolam infusion versus intermittent bolus administration during BAE.
- To determine if continuous infusion provides a greater proportion of time under conscious sedation (Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4).
- To evaluate secondary outcomes including procedure interruptions, patient and endoscopist satisfaction, drug dosage, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted across 15 Japanese National Hospital Organization institutions.
- Patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic BAE were randomized to receive either continuous intravenous midazolam infusion or intermittent bolus administration.
- The primary endpoint was the proportion of time spent in conscious sedation, with secondary endpoints assessing procedural and safety parameters.
Main Results:
- The proportion of time under conscious sedation was similar between the continuous infusion and intermittent bolus groups (0.637±0.315 vs. 0.609±0.272, p=0.721).
- The continuous infusion group exhibited a trend towards fewer body movements causing procedure interruption (7.9% vs. 25.0%, p=0.091).
- Continuous infusion required a higher total midazolam dose, but adverse event incidence was comparable between groups.
Conclusions:
- Continuous midazolam infusion did not prove superior to intermittent bolus administration in maintaining conscious sedation during BAE.
- Continuous infusion effectively suppressed body movements during BAE without an increase in adverse events.
- Continuous midazolam infusion represents a viable sedation strategy for BAE procedures in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
07:54Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...