Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Mapping hidden risks in mine tailings: A multi-variable geostatistical framework for environmental management
Collins G Adoko1, Nasser Madani2, Mohammad Maleki3
1School of Mining and Geosciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan; WH Bryan Mining Geology Research Centre, Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; ARC Centre in Critical Resources for the Future, Perth, Australia.
Abstract:
The growing volume of mine tailings presents both environmental risks and opportunities for secondary resource recovery. Accurate spatial estimation of both valuable and potentially harmful elements within these deposits is essential not only for evaluating reprocessing potential but also for assessing environmental liabilities and guiding remediation strategies. Univariate geostatistical approaches, such as linear kriging, are limited in their ability to capture non-linear relationships and to quantify local uncertainty-particularly the probability or extent of threshold exceedance-across spatially variable and heterotopically sampled datasets, as commonly encountered in legacy tailings deposits. They also struggle to represent inter-variable correlations critical for joint risk and resource assessments. This study introduces a novel extension of multi-Gaussian kriging (MGK) to a multivariate framework-termed multi-Gaussian cokriging (MGCOK)-which enables the joint estimation of local recoverable functions, including mean concentrations, estimated metal/element quantity, and the volume of material exceeding specified environmental or regulatory threshold levels. The methodology is applied to the Haveri tailings deposit in Finland, focusing on sulfur (S), iron (Fe), and cobalt (Co), elements that are relevant to environmental monitoring. MGCOK leverages cross-variable correlations and a linear model of coregionalization to improve predictions of local recoverable functions by incorporating information from more densely sampled ones. Compared to standard MGK; MGCOK yields reduced estimation variance, and improve delineation of zones with elevated concentrations that may warrant environmental attention. Cross-validation confirms its superior performance, particularly for under-sampled and highly variable elements. This work highlights the utility of multivariate non-linear geostatistical modeling as a tool for environmental risk assessment in complex mine tailings environments, as well as, even though not studied in here, it has potential for resource evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Manipulation and Analysis
Hazard Rate
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

