Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Ulnar Artery Access in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sant Kumar1, Dimitrios Strepkos2, Michaella Alexandrou2
1Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Insights
Ulnar artery access for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI) is safe and effective, showing similar outcomes to radial and femoral access. This approach, used in less complex cases, warrants further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Ulnar artery access presents a potential alternative for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI).
- Limited data currently exists on its utilization and outcomes compared to traditional access routes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the use, patient demographics, and in-hospital results of ulnar artery access versus radial and non-ulnar access in CTO PCI.
- To compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and technical success rates between different access sites.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 18,826 patients undergoing CTO PCI from 2012-2024 across 51 centers in the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.
- Patients were categorized into three groups: no radial/ulnar access, radial access only, and ulnar access.
- In-hospital MACE, technical success, and access complications were primary and secondary endpoints, analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Ulnar access was utilized in 0.8% of cases (147 patients), who were younger and had a higher prevalence of prior PCI and peripheral arterial disease.
- Lesion complexity was lower in the ulnar access group.
- In-hospital outcomes including MACE (2.7%), technical success (83.7%), and access complications (0.7%) were similar across all access groups.
Conclusions:
- Ulnar artery access in CTO PCI, though used infrequently, demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy to radial and femoral access in this large series.
- The observed use in lower complexity cases suggests a need for prospective studies to confirm these hypothesis-generating findings.
Background:
Ulnar artery access may provide an alternative access route for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI), but data is limited.
Aims:
To assess the utilization, patient characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of ulnar artery access compared with radial access and non-ulnar access in patients undergoing CTO PCI.
Methods:
We analyzed patients who underwent CTO PCI between 2012 and 2024 at 51 centers within the PROGRESS-CTO Registry. Patients were stratified by access: (1) no radial/ulnar, (2) radial without ulnar, and (3) ulnar. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included technical success. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of outcomes.
Results:
Among 18,826 patients, 8844 (47.0%) had no radial/ulnar access, 9835 (52.2%) radial without ulnar, and 147 (0.8%) ulnar. Ulnar patients were younger (62.5 ± 10.4 vs. 64.0 ± 10.4 radial and ulnar, 65.1 ± 10.5 no radial/ulnar, p < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of prior PCI (73.6% vs. 59.3% and 64.0%, p < 0.001) and peripheral arterial disease (23.9% vs. 12.1% and 15.1%, p < 0.001). Lesion complexity was lower with ulnar access (J-CTO 2.19 ± 1.27 vs. 2.32 ± 1.27 radial and 2.47 ± 1.21 no radial/ulnar, p < 0.001). In-hospital outcomes were similar: MACE (2.7% ulnar vs. 1.8% radial vs. 2.0% no radial/ulnar, p = 0.315), technical success (83.7% vs. 87.3% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.425), and access complications (0.7% vs. 0.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.001). Logistic regression showed no independent association between ulnar access and MACE, technical success, or access-site complications.
Conclusion:
In the largest series to date, ulnar access was used in 0.8% of CTO PCI with similar outcomes to radial and femoral access. Given its use in lower complexity cases, these findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Angina IV: Management

