Getting the Manifold Right: The Crucial Role of Orbital Resolution in DFT+U for Mixed d-f Electron Compounds
Kinga Warda1,2,3, Eric Macke4,5, Iurii Timrov6
1Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy Technologies, Theory and Computation of Energy Materials (IET-3), 52425 Jülich, Germany.
Abstract:
Accurately modeling compounds with partially filled d and f shells remains a hard challenge for density-functional theory, due to large self-interaction errors stemming from local or semilocal exchange-correlation functionals. Hubbard U corrections can mitigate such errors, but are often detrimental to the description of hybridized states, leading to spurious force contributions and wrong lattice structures. Here, we show that careful disentanglement of localized and delocalized states leads to accurate predictions of electronic states and structural distortions in ternary monouranates (AUO4, where A represents Mn, Co, or Ni), for which standard U corrections generally fail. Crucial to achieving such accuracy is a minimization of the mismatch between the spatial extension of the projector functions and the true coordination geometry. This requires Wannier-like alternatives to atomic-orbital projector functions, or corrections of Hubbard manifolds exclusively comprised of the most localized A-3d, U-5f and O-2p orbitals. These findings open up the computational prediction of fundamental properties of actinide solids of critical technological importance.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Orbitals
Valence Bond Theory and Hybridized Orbitals
A σ bond (single bond in a Lewis structure) is a covalent bond in which the electron density is...
Electron Orbital Model
The first shell is closest to the nucleus, and it has only one subshell with a single spherical orbital called the...
Electron Configurations
The relative energies of the subshells determine the order in which atomic orbitals are filled (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p,...
Molecular Orbital Theory II
The Energies of Atomic Orbitals


