Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.6K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.6K
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

469
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
469
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

211
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
211
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

39.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
39.4K
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

391
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
391

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficient planning and implementation of optimal foraging strategies under energetic constraints.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Maintaining and updating accurate internal representations of continuous variables with a handful of neurons.

Nature neuroscience·2024
Same author

A vast space of compact strategies for effective decisions.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Dynamics of cortical contrast adaptation predict perception of signals in noise.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

The effect of weak clonal interference on average fitness trajectories in the presence of macroscopic epistasis.

Genetics·2022
Same author

Programming cell growth into different cluster shapes using diffusible signals.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same journal

On phase transitions to interdisciplinary and convergent research.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Confident judgments of (mis)information veracity are more, rather than less, accurate.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A cultural explanation for parole decisions in the United States.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

A transformer-based language model reveals developmental constraint and network complexity during zebrafish embryogenesis.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same journal

Dual phosphoregulatory mechanisms of condensin I revealed by biochemical reconstitution.

PNAS nexus·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Environmental dynamics impact whether matching is optimal.

Yipei Guo1,2, Ann M Hermundstad1

  • 1Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.

PNAS Nexus
|January 7, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animals often match choices to reward probabilities. This study reveals matching is optimal when resource replenishment dynamics are similar, but deviations occur when dynamics differ, impacting foraging strategies.

Keywords:
choice behaviorforagingmatching lawstochastic environmentsuncertainty

More Related Videos

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.4K
A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Decision Theory
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Foraging animals often exhibit matching behavior, allocating choices to equalize reward rates across options.
  • Matching can be optimal under diminishing returns, but optimality also depends on resource replenishment dynamics.
  • Environmental properties like temporal structure and replenishment statistics influence resource availability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how environmental properties of resource replenishment influence the optimality of matching behavior in foraging animals.
  • To analytically determine the conditions under which the optimal foraging policy exhibits matching.
  • To identify environments where performance differs between matching and optimal strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling a foraging agent sampling options at fixed rates.
  • Deriving reward probabilities across different environmental replenishment dynamics.
  • Analytically determining conditions for optimal matching policies.

Main Results:

  • Matching is generally optimal when all options share identical replenishment dynamics.
  • Optimal policies deviate from matching when replenishment dynamics differ across options.
  • Deviations from matching (under- or over-matching) depend on the qualitative nature of replenishment processes and relative reward rates.

Conclusions:

  • Environmental variability, particularly differing replenishment dynamics and fluctuations, significantly impacts foraging optimality.
  • The study provides testable predictions for how animals adapt their foraging strategies to complex environments.
  • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for explaining behavioral variability and optimizing decision-making models.