Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

05:05
Quantification of Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate-based Micro- and Nano-plastics from Soil Using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: June 6, 2025
719
Quantification of brominated flame retardants in soil
Wojciech Jerzy Pietroń1, Monika Baran1, Marek Pajurek1
1Department of Chemical Research of Food and Feed, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.
Journal of Veterinary Research
|January 7, 2026
Summary
A new method accurately detects polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and novel brominated flame retardants (nBFRs) in soil. This tool aids environmental monitoring and ensures food safety by assessing soil contamination impacts.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Food Safety
Background:
- Soil quality is vital for farm animals, especially in free-range and organic farming.
- Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), can contaminate soil and impact animal-derived food.
- Novel brominated flame retardants (nBFRs) share environmental behaviors with PBDEs, necessitating their monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a multicomponent analytical method for quantifying 10 PBDE congeners and 8 nBFR compounds in soil.
- To establish a reliable procedure for environmental monitoring of BFRs in agricultural soils.
Main Methods:
- Adaptation of a high-resolution gas chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC-HRMS) technique.
- Analysis of soil samples from both potentially contaminated and uncontaminated sites.
- Optimization of extraction and clean-up steps to handle diverse physicochemical properties of target analytes.
Main Results:
- The method demonstrated high sensitivity, precision, and repeatability for PBDEs and nBFRs.
- Quantification ranges were established: ∑PBDEs (0.16-1700 ng·g⁻¹ d.w.) and ∑nBFRs (0.072-1130 ng·g⁻¹ d.w.).
- PBDEs were found at higher levels (0.23-485.7 ng·g⁻¹ d.w.) in contaminated soils compared to nBFRs (0.11-0.81 ng·g⁻¹ d.w.).
Conclusions:
- The validated method is a valuable tool for environmental monitoring of BFRs in soil.
- It supports risk assessment concerning soil contamination and its potential effects on food safety.
- Addresses the need for monitoring due to the absence of regulatory limits for BFRs in food and feed.

