Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
12.4K
Patient-specific cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty
Craig Zhao1, James G Jefferies1, Kanniraj Marimuthu2
1Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah, Australia.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|January 7, 2026
Summary
Patient-specific guides (PSGs) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) show little to no difference in implant survival, function, or alignment compared to conventional methods. Further research is needed to clarify their impact on clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomedical engineering
- Clinical trials
Background:
- Accurate lower limb alignment is crucial for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes.
- Patient-specific guides (PSGs) aim to enhance surgical precision and efficiency in TKA.
- The clinical benefits and functional impact of PSGs in TKA remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the benefits and harms of PSGs versus conventional instrumentation or computer-assisted navigation in primary TKA.
- To compare implant survival, function, alignment, pain, and adverse events between different TKA guidance methods.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSGs to conventional instrumentation (CON) or computer-assisted navigation (NAV).
- Searched major databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase up to January 2025.
- Included 44 studies with 3664 participants, assessing outcomes like implant survival, function, alignment, pain, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- PSGs showed little to no difference in implant survival, function, lower limb alignment precision, pain, adverse events, or re-operation rates compared to conventional instrumentation (low-certainty evidence).
- Compared to computer-assisted navigation, PSGs demonstrated little to no difference in function but potentially worse precision in lower limb alignment (low-certainty evidence).
- Most included trials had a high risk of bias, particularly in performance and detection.
Conclusions:
- Low-certainty evidence suggests no significant differences in key outcomes (implant survival, function, pain, adverse events) between PSGs and conventional instrumentation or computer-assisted navigation in TKA.
- The current evidence base, characterized by high risk of bias, limits definitive conclusions on the superiority of PSGs.
- Further high-quality research is necessary to ascertain the true benefits of patient-specific guides in total knee arthroplasty.

