Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Unique Mouse Model of Asphyxia-Induced Cardiac Arrest
Published on: April 14, 2023
Impact of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Medications on Discharge Neurological Function for Survivors of Cardiac
Maxwell Hockstein1, Nicholas J Johnson2, Joshua J Horns3
1Departments of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (M.A.H.).
Background:
While the immediate goal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is to achieve return of spontaneous circulation, the patient-centered goal is to minimize neurological injury. Several medications used during cardiac arrest have been associated with poor neurological outcomes. For patients cannulated for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiac arrest, termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the patient-centered impact of these medications has not yet been described.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry-based analysis. The primary outcome was cerebral performance category (CPC) score at hospital discharge. Cumulative odds models assessed the association between either (1) binary receipt of a medication or (2) the number of epinephrine milligrams given, and CPC score. The model reports the probability of having a score lower than each CPC level. To minimize bias in the receipt of advanced cardiovascular life support drugs, we used inverse probability treatment weights.
Results:
Antiarrhythmics were associated with better neurological outcomes (amiodarone: CPC ≤ 1 [odds ratio [OR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.00-1.65]; P=0.048] and CPC ≤ 2 [OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06-1.78]; P=0.015]; lidocaine: CPC ≤ 1 [OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.32-2.17]; P<0.001], CPC ≤ 2 [OR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.39-2.38]; P<0.001], CPC ≤ 3 [OR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.30-2.40]; P<0.001]). Intraarrest sodium bicarbonate administration resulted in a lower likelihood of a CPC < 2 to 3 (CPC ≤ 2 [OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]; P<0.001], CPC ≤ 3 [OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.49-0.86]; P=0.003]). There was no significant difference in CPC score among adults who received intraarrest calcium. The unweighted cumulative effects model demonstrated a dose-dependent increasing relationship between epinephrine doses and harm for all CPC levels (OR, 0.89-0.94; P<0.001 for all).
Conclusions:
Our data support that increasing doses of epinephrine and nonantiarrhythmic advanced cardiovascular life support medications both worsen the probability of neurologically intact survival for patients who undergo extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
More Related Videos
07:02Utilizing the Modified T-Maze to Assess Functional Memory Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest
Published on: January 5, 2018
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care