Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A framework for addressing racial and related inequities in conservation
Moreangels M Mbizah1, Tanesha Allen2, Shorna Allred3,4,5
1Wildlife Conservation Action, Harare, Zimbabwe. moreangelsm@gmail.com.
None:
In 2020, a global surge of activism linked to the Black Lives Matter movement prompted scientists to stage an academic 'strike', drawing attention to the ethical responsibility of addressing systemic racism. This catalysed debate in conservation, adding urgency to decades of scholarship on marginalization. In this Perspective, we review this literature and examine how exclusion in conservation persists across intersections of race, class, urban-rural divides, nationality and power dynamics from local to global levels. We highlight how marginalization and 'othering' disproportionately affect Black, Indigenous and people of colour (BIPOC) communities, especially in the Global South. Expansion of protected areas and the prioritization of individual animal lives over human well-being can intensify such inequities. We propose a framework for more inclusive conservation: recognizing and supporting human rights, ensuring local community agency, challenging entrenched norms in BIPOC engagement, and fostering educational opportunities led by and for BIPOC communities. Amid shifting global politics, including reduced US federal support for social and conservation issues, this framework provides guidance to counter racism and exclusion. By rethinking conservation practice, it seeks to build long-lasting, equitable and inclusive approaches that respect both people and nature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations
Threats to Biodiversity
Biodiversity and Human Values
Habitat Fragmentation

