Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

08:50
Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: August 20, 2019
15.0K
Differential neural responses to rhythmic and patterned TMS protocols: Insights from EEG spectral analysis
Thomas E Valles1,2, Mohamad Shamas3,4, Hope Hawkins3,4
1TMS Clinical and Research Service, Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. tvalles@mednet.ucla.edu.
Summary
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) protocols, rhythmic and patterned, uniquely impact brain activity and connectivity in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients. Understanding these differences is key for optimizing rTMS treatment effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a neuromodulation technique used for treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
- rTMS employs various protocols, including rhythmic and patterned stimulation (e.g., intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation - iTBS).
- The differential effects of these rTMS protocols on brain function remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct effects of rhythmic and patterned rTMS protocols on brain oscillatory activity and effective connectivity.
- To examine how stimulation frequency influences these neural changes within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC).
Main Methods:
- Sixteen MDD subjects underwent a TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) paradigm.
- A wide range of rhythmic and patterned stimulation frequencies were applied to the L-DLPFC in a randomized order.
- Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze changes in power, connectivity, and source localization.
Main Results:
- Both rhythmic and patterned rTMS induced widespread changes in brain power and connectivity, dependent on protocol and frequency.
- Patterned stimulation predominantly increased beta band power, while rhythmic stimulation increased alpha and beta power above 7 Hz.
- Distinct regional activations (cingulate) and connectivity patterns (precuneus, orbitofrontal cortex) were observed for each protocol.
Conclusions:
- Rhythmic and patterned rTMS protocols engage distinct brain networks in a frequency- and protocol-specific manner.
- These findings highlight the mechanistic differences between rTMS protocols.
- Further research is needed to correlate these neural distinctions with clinical outcomes in MDD treatment.

