Hypoxemia prediction in pediatric patients under general anesthesia using machine learning: A retrospective

Sujin Baek1,2, Jung-Bin Park3, Jihye Heo4

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Plos One
|January 8, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Machine learning models can predict hypoxemia in pediatric patients during general anesthesia. The Transformer model showed strong external validation, improving patient safety through advanced monitoring during anesthesia.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Pediatric Care

Background:

  • Pediatric patients under general anesthesia face high risks of hypoxemia and oxygen desaturation.
  • Anesthesiologists require enhanced vigilance due to the challenges in pediatric anesthesia management.
  • Continuous intraoperative oxygenation monitoring is crucial, but traditional SpO2 methods have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate machine learning models for predicting hypoxemia in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia.
  • To evaluate the performance of XGBoost, LSTM, InceptionTime, and Transformer models.
  • To assess the impact of observation window size on model accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective observational study involving 934 pediatric cases from two university hospitals.
  • Analysis of vital signs and ventilator parameters sampled every 2 seconds.
  • Evaluation of four machine learning models using AUROC, AUPRC, and F1-score.

Main Results:

  • XGBoost achieved the highest internal validation performance (AUROC, 0.85).
  • The Transformer model demonstrated superior external validation performance (AUROC, 0.83).
  • Reducing the observation window decreased AUPRC but maintained high AUROC.

Conclusions:

  • XGBoost and Transformer models show promise for predicting intraoperative hypoxemia in pediatric patients.
  • Age-related adjustments did not improve model performance.
  • Future research should refine models to distinguish true hypoxemia for better clinical outcomes.
Abstract