Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Beyond the checklist: development and validation of a multidimensional clinical competency assessment tool for
August Longino1, Braidie Campbell2, Eric Grimm3
1Formerly Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, United States.
Problem:
Medical residents perform bedside procedures that affect patient outcomes. However, no national standard exists to determine when residents can perform procedures without direct supervision. The utility and feasibility of various procedural competency assessment methods remain unclear.
Approach:
A multidimensional clinical competency assessment tool (CAT) was developed to evaluate procedural performance using a checklist, global skills assessment (GSA), and Entrustment Score (ES). Residents had to meet cutoffs for all 3 components to pass. Checklist cutoffs were set using the Angoff method. The CAT assessed internal medicine interns performing large-volume paracentesis (LVP) and central venous catheter insertion (CVC) across 3 hospital systems from July 2022 to June 2023. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using 2 simultaneous assessments.
Outcomes:
The CAT was completed in 29.7% (174) of LVP and CVC procedures performed by postgraduate year-1s. The checklist passing cutoffs were <9 mistakes for LVP and <6 for CVC. Among 23 LVP dual assessments, 3 (13%) achieved passing scores with no disagreement (Cohen's kappa = 1.0). Although 85% of LVPs met the checklist cutoff, only 20% met the GSA cutoff and 15% for ES. Of 14 CVC dual assessments, none achieved passing agreement and 2 had disagreement, a percent agreement of 87%. Seventy-five percent of CVCs met the checklist cutoff, 14% of GSA, and 7% of ES.
Next Steps:
This study demonstrates the feasibility and reliability of implementing a multidimensional clinical CAT. Checklists alone did not accurately assess competency; however, combined with holistic scores, they yielded strong overall inter-rater agreement and more appropriate pass rates for this cohort. These findings support using multiple complementary assessment methods to better identify competent performances. Future steps include refining checklists to focus on critical steps, evaluating bias in holistic scoring, and assessing the CAT over an extended period with a cohort spanning a broader range of expertise.
More Related Videos
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
08:36The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Published on: July 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Critical Thinking II
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...