Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Exploration vs. Exploitation in a Novel Complex Card Matching Task: Evidence from Pupillometry
Giovanna C Del Sordo1, Megan H Papesh2
1Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, MSC 3452, PO BOX 30001, Las Cruces, NM, 88003-8001, USA. delsordo@nmsu.edu.
Pupil size reflects the brain's exploration-exploitation tradeoff. Larger pupils during exploration suggest higher arousal, while exploitation's pupil response varies with task difficulty, revealing cognitive effort.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision-Making Research
Background:
- The exploration-exploitation tradeoff is crucial for optimizing decisions.
- The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system regulates this tradeoff.
- Pupillometry noninvasively measures LC activity, reflecting tonic and phasic states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate pupillary dynamics during exploration-exploitation transitions.
- To assess the impact of task difficulty on these dynamics.
- To validate the Complex Card Matching Task (CCMT) for studying cognitive flexibility.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pupillometry to measure pupil size.
- Introduced the novel Complex Card Matching Task (CCMT) with two difficulty levels.
- Analyzed pupil size in relation to exploration and exploitation behaviors.
Main Results:
- Exploration consistently showed larger pupil sizes than exploitation.
- Task difficulty modulated exploitation, with larger pupils in harder conditions.
- Exploration-related pupil responses were unaffected by task difficulty, indicating stable arousal.
Conclusions:
- Pupillary dynamics provide insights into the exploration-exploitation tradeoff.
- Exploration is associated with sustained arousal, while exploitation is sensitive to cognitive load.
- The CCMT is a valuable tool for studying decision-making and cognitive flexibility.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Trial and Error and Algorithm

