Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Role of Unfolded Protein Response in HIV-1 Replication and Infectivity
Published on: June 14, 2024
SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV disrupt host protein synthesis via nsp1 with differential effects on the integrated stress
Nicholas A Parenti1,2, Renee Cusic3,4,5, David M Renner1,2
1Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract:
Coronaviruses pose a serious threat to public health, driving the need for antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Therefore, it is paramount to understand how this family of viruses evades cellular antiviral responses and establishes productive infection. The conserved coronavirus non-structural protein (nsp)1 has been shown to inhibit host protein synthesis and promote host mRNA degradation while viral mRNAs are protected. We showed previously that SARS-CoV-2 induces activation of host integrated stress response (ISR) kinases PKR and PERK, which promote phosphorylation of eIF2α and consequent inhibition of host protein synthesis. In contrast, eIF2α remains unphosphorylated during MERS-CoV infection. To investigate the interactions of nsp1 and the ISR kinases, we utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV expressing nsp1 with mutations in each of two conserved domains. Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants, translation was shut down in wildtype (WT) and PKR knockout (KO) cells but rescued in PERK KO cells, likely due to reduced p-eIF2α. In contrast, translation was rescued during infection with the analogous MERS-CoV nsp1 mutants even in WT cells. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed expression of GADD34, a negative regulator of eIF2α phosphorylation, while SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 mutants induced GADD34. In contrast MERS-CoV WT induced GADD34. Utilizing single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization, we found that SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 promote host mRNA degradation during WT, but not nsp1 mutant, infection. Finally, while SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed stress granule formation, nsp1 mutants induced stress granules containing host RNA. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV differ in interactions with the ISR and nsp1 control of host protein synthesis.
Insights
Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV evade host defenses by manipulating protein synthesis. Understanding these differences is key to developing new antiviral therapies against these serious public health threats.
Area of Science:
- Virology and Molecular Biology
- Host-Pathogen Interactions
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Coronaviruses (CoVs) pose significant global health risks, necessitating effective antiviral treatments and vaccines.
- Understanding how CoVs, particularly SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, overcome host antiviral mechanisms is crucial for disease control.
- The conserved non-structural protein (nsp)1 is known to inhibit host protein synthesis and degrade host mRNAs, while protecting viral RNA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV nsp1 proteins interact with and manipulate the host integrated stress response (ISR).
- To elucidate how nsp1 from different betacoronaviruses affects host protein synthesis, mRNA stability, and stress granule formation.
- To identify differences in nsp1 function between SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV that could inform the development of targeted antiviral strategies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV expressing nsp1 mutants with alterations in conserved domains.
- Infected wildtype (WT) and knockout (PKR KO, PERK KO) cells to assess host protein synthesis.
- Employed single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) to analyze host mRNA degradation.
- Monitored stress granule formation and expression of GADD34, a regulator of eIF2α phosphorylation.
Main Results:
- SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 infection led to translation shutdown in WT and PKR KO cells, but this was rescued in PERK KO cells, suggesting PERK's role.
- MERS-CoV nsp1 mutants rescued translation even in WT cells, indicating a different interaction with the ISR.
- SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed GADD34, while nsp1 mutants and MERS-CoV WT induced it.
- Both viruses' nsp1 proteins promoted host mRNA degradation, but SARS-CoV-2 WT suppressed stress granule formation, whereas its nsp1 mutants induced them.
Conclusions:
- SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV exhibit distinct strategies in their interaction with the host ISR and nsp1-mediated control of protein synthesis.
- Differences in nsp1 function between these lethal coronaviruses highlight the complexity of coronavirus-host interactions.
- These findings provide critical insights for developing specific antiviral therapeutics against current and future coronavirus outbreaks.
Related Concept Videos
Other Stress Responses in Bacteria
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response
Stringent Response in E. coli
Translational Regulation
The Unfolded Protein Response
Coordination of Gene Expression Processes in Bacteria

