Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Inter-practice variability in registrar experiences of continuity of care: a cross-sectional analysis from the
Adele Kincses1, Alison Fielding1,2, Amanda Tapley1,2
1GP Training Research, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
Background:
Continuity of care is a defining feature of general practice, with strong evidence for improved patient outcomes. Variability in practices' rates of continuity could markedly influence general practitioner (GP) registrars' learning experience. Previous research found "upstream" (registrar previously seen patient) continuity of 43% and "downstream" (follow-up appointment arranged between registrar and patient) continuity of 49% in Australian GP registrars.
Objectives:
This study aimed to assess inter-practice variability in registrar experience of continuity of care.
Methods:
Cross-sectional analysis (2010-23) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training study of GP registrars' in-consultation clinical experiences. Outcome factors were "upstream" and "downstream" continuity. Inter-practice variability was assessed using median odds ratios (MORs). Outcome variance attributable to practice was estimated within the Bayesian modeling framework using a mixed-effects logistic regression with cross-classified random effects for registrar and practice.
Results:
The analysis included 4643 registrars (response rate 93.3%) across 978 practices. 42.5% (289 426) of registrar consults involved "upstream" continuity and 45.5% (313 295) of registrar consults involved "downstream" continuity. The MOR values were 1.47 [credible interval [CrI] (1.44, 1.50)] and 1.40 [CrI (1.38, 1.43)], for "upstream" and "downstream" continuity, respectively, in a model with random effects for practice and registrar; and 1.35 [CrI (1.32, 1.37)] and 1.38 [CrI (1.36, 1.41)], respectively, in the model adjusted for time/registrar/patient/consultation/consultation outcome/practice variables.
Conclusions:
Considerable variability exists in continuity of care measures between GP training practices. This has implications for registrars' learning opportunities, particularly in chronic disease management-essential in the context of an aging population. Strategies to improve registrars' continuity of care in practices with lower rates of continuity should be considered.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
04:36Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...