Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

High-throughput DNA Extraction and Genotyping of 3dpf Zebrafish Larvae by Fin Clipping
Published on: June 29, 2018
Swift SNPs: Evaluating Rapid DNA Extraction Methods for Scalable Genotyping in Aquaculture
Emily Rhodes1, Dean Jerry2, David B Jones2
1Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries & Aquaculture, The College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. emilygrace.rhodes@my.jcu.edu.au.
None:
Efficient DNA extraction is critical for high-throughput genotyping in aquaculture breeding programs, where cost, speed, and data quality must be balanced. This study compared five rapid extraction methods-HotSHOT, Chelex, Tween, wax-coated dipstick, and bare dipstick-against a conventional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol for use in Lates calcarifer (barramundi) genotyping. DNA yield, purity, and integrity were measured by spectrophotometry, fluorometry, and Agilent TapeStation. Performance was tested in microsatellite genotyping, tyrosinase-related protein 1b (TYRP1b) gene sequencing, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping on the Tecan Allegro Targeted Resequencing V2 platform. CTAB produced the highest-quality DNA (30.3 ± 17.4 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.91 ± 0.26; DIN = 8.78) with reliable results in all assays. Despite lower quality (1.07 ± 0.30 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.44 ± 0.18; DIN ≈ 1.6), HotSHOT performed similarly: SNP concordance with CTAB averaged 82.3%, microsatellite amplification reached 93.1% (vs. 99.3% for CTAB), and all HotSHOT samples yielded high-quality TYRP1b sequences. Chelex, Tween, and dipstick methods had lower success, likely due to inadequate yield and purity. HotSHOT was the most effective rapid alternative to CTAB, with significantly higher SNP concordance (82.3% vs. others; p < 0.005). These results show that method choice strongly influences target-capture genotyping success and support HotSHOT as a cost-effective, scalable option for aquaculture genomics.

