Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Beyond compliance: Patient risk, ERAS adherence, and postoperative outcomes through explainable machine learning
J Ripollés-Melchor1, Á V Espinosa2, A Abad-Motos3
1Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Working Group, Spanish Society of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Madrid, Spain.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols show variable adherence. Machine learning identified patient frailty and specific ERAS items as key predictors of complications, enabling tailored surgical recovery strategies.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
- Machine Learning in Medicine
Background:
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are crucial for improving outcomes in colorectal surgery.
- Variable adherence to ERAS protocols and patient-specific risk factors can impact surgical outcomes.
- Traditional compliance metrics lack the granularity to analyze the interplay between ERAS adherence and patient risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the impact of individual ERAS components and clinical factors on postoperative complications using interpretable machine learning.
- To identify distinct patient phenotypes based on ERAS adherence and clinical characteristics.
- To develop data-driven insights for optimizing ERAS strategies in colorectal surgery.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of the prospective EuroPOWER cohort (NCT04889798) involving 2,841 adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
- Development and interpretation of two Extreme Gradient Boosting models using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to predict in-hospital complications.
- Clustering of SHAP matrices from a comprehensive model (clinical variables + ERAS items) to derive patient phenotypes.
Main Results:
- The comprehensive model demonstrated good predictive performance (AUC 0.627).
- Key predictors of complications included patient frailty, ASA class, BMI, and age, alongside ERAS components like early mobilization and nutritional care.
- Three distinct patient phenotypes (robust, intermediate, frail) were identified with varying complication rates (17.7% to 41.1%).
Conclusions:
- ERAS adherence's effectiveness is influenced by patient baseline vulnerability and protocol implementation.
- SHAP-based models offer transparent risk assessment and enable the identification of patient phenotypes.
- These findings support the development of personalized ERAS strategies and automated quality monitoring tools for surgical care.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020