Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Syngeneic Orthotopic Osteosarcoma Sprague Dawley Rat Model with Amputation to Control Metastasis Rate
Published on: May 3, 2021
Choosing the right animal model for sarcoma research
Piotr Remiszewski1,2, Eryk Siedlecki1,2, Marlena Wełniak-Kamińska3
1Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract:
Sarcomas comprise over 100 mesenchymal malignancies characterised by extreme genomic heterogeneity, ranging from fusion-driven paediatric tumours to highly unstable adult leiomyosarcomas. This genetic complexity shapes tumour behaviour, influences growth and metastasis, and determines how patients respond to therapy. Accurate animal models must reflect not only the molecular characteristics of these tumours, but also their microenvironment and dynamic interaction with the host immune system. The diversity of this group of cancers presents different challenges for animal model selection, particularly as sarcoma-specific resources are very limited. Therefore, we have reviewed in detail several types of models, including: syngeneic (e.g., MCA205 and KRIMS series), chemically induced (e.g., MCA, DMBA), cell-derived xenografts (CDX; e.g., KCS8 and KCS9 osteosarcoma lines), patient-derived xenograft (PDX; e.g., pleomorphic leiomyosarcoma and GIST models), including humanised PDX (huPDX; e.g. HuNOG-EXL), and zebrafish (e.g. tp53M214K PNST and EWS-FLI1 transgenics) - to illustrate their sarcoma-specific use cases and discuss their advantages and limitations. Genetically engineered models and their development are not a subject of this review, as they represent a very broad subject independently and are discussed elsewhere.

